Are Europe And The US Expected To Reflect Proportions Of The Global Demographic When The Left Wing Is Through With Them ?

[Monk-Eye]

" Are Europe And The US Expected To Reflect Proportions Of The Global Demographic When The Left Wing Is Through With Them ? "

* Motivations For Reverse Racism *

Add up the total number of individuals around the world according to race and which proportion of the global demographic does each race represent , such that are europe and the us expected to reflect proportions of the global demographic when the left wing is through with them ?

Now we all know that the left is engaged in a pogrom of anti-racist racism intended to continue the dissolution of white peoples as a majority until and even beyond a point where they lose an ability to stop it .

From a white perspective , which the left hysterically raves and associates with white supremacy and hate speech , having a portion of other peoples is one thing , while turning whites into a minority is another issue , which none on the anti-racist racist left would admit its expects to occur for the other races throughout the world .

* Any Supposition For Further Obligation Is Mute *

There is not any doubt as to why ted kennedy died of left hemisphere brain rot and the typical bloat in human population from religion of left wing secular humanism over efficiency and merit based employment is obvious .

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

During debate on the Senate floor, Senator Ted Kennedy, speaking of the effects of the Act, said, "our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. ... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset."[21]

Democrat Rep. Michael A. Feighan (OH-20), along with some other Democrats, insisted that "family unification" should take priority over "employability", on the premise that such a weighting would maintain the existing ethnic profile of the country. That change in policy instead resulted in chain migration dominating the subsequent patterns of immigration to the United States.[23][24] In removing racial and national discrimination the Act would significantly alter the demographic mix in the U.S.[25]

 

[Gdjjr]

Demographics produce ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE remedies to problems that don't exist-

 

[PoliticalChic]

Democrat Rep. Michael A. Feighan (OH-20), along with some other Democrats, insisted that "family unification" should take priority over "employability", on the premise that such a weighting would maintain the existing ethnic profile of the country.

"Democrat Rep. Michael A. Feighan (OH-20), along with some other Democrats, insisted that "family unification" should take priority over "employability", on the premise that such a weighting would maintain the existing ethnic profile of the country. "


Except that the lying low-life Liberals never wanted to "maintain the existing ethnic profile of the country. "


Their aim was always to replace the American population that no longer voted for them, with a more malleable substitute population.


A little history here.....the Democrat plan was to replace Americans, and the usual immigrants who agreed with American values, with third world immigrants who need welfare and will vote Democrat for same.
Putting their interests before those of America and Americans is nothing new for Democrats.....they hate America and Americans.




Democrats knew what they were doing when they passed the 1965 immigration law that altered the flow from European immigrants to the flood from third world nations.

" Prior to 1965, the demographics of immigration stood as mostly Europeans; 68 percent of legal immigrants in the 1950s came from Europe and Canada.

The proponents of the [Democrat] Hart–Celler Act argued that it would not significantly influence United States culture. [Democrat] President Johnson called the bill "not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions."[16] [Democrat] Secretary of StateDean Rusk and other politicians, including [Democrat] Senator Ted Kennedy, asserted that the bill would not affect US demographic mix.[17] However, the ethnic composition of immigrants changed following the passage of the law.[18][19] Specifically, the [Democrat] Hart–Celler Act allowed increased numbers of people to migrate to the United States from Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Southern and Eastern Europe." Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 - Wikipedia



Democrats certainly must hate American culture, huh?



As a result of the Democrat Immigration act of 1965, the nations that contribute the greatest number of immigrants are not the same ones responsible for the founding of the nation. Case in point, we take more immigrants from Nigeria than we do from Britain. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Lawful_Permanent_Residents_2013.pdf




Former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Bin Mohamad said in a speech in 1997: "We do have the ultimate weapon. People are more mobile now. They can go anywhere. . . . If we are not allowed a good life in our countries, if we are going to be global citizens, then we should migrate North. We should migrate North in our millions, legally or illegally. Masses of Asians and Africans should inundate Europe and America."
Half a Century of Barely Controlled Immigration

How would he vote, Democrat or Republican?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Definitely A Situation Of Supreme Court Concern "

* Shedding Light On Snowflakes Educated In Political Correctness Of Being Objective As An Excuse For Ignorance *

"Democrat Rep. Michael A. Feighan (OH-20), along with some other Democrats, insisted that "family unification" should take priority over "employability", on the premise that such a weighting would maintain the existing ethnic profile of the country. "
Except that the lying low-life Liberals never wanted to "maintain the existing ethnic profile of the country. "
Their aim was always to replace the American population that no longer voted for them, with a more malleable substitute population.
A little history here.....the Democrat plan was to replace Americans, and the usual immigrants who agreed with American values, with third world immigrants who need welfare and will vote Democrat for same.
Putting their interests before those of America and Americans is nothing new for Democrats.....they hate America and Americans.
Democrats knew what they were doing when they passed the 1965 immigration law that altered the flow from European immigrants to the flood from third world nations.
" Prior to 1965, the demographics of immigration stood as mostly Europeans; 68 percent of legal immigrants in the 1950s came from Europe and Canada.
The proponents of the [Democrat] Hart–Celler Act argued that it would not significantly influence United States culture. [Democrat] President Johnson called the bill "not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions."[16] [Democrat] Secretary of StateDean Rusk and other politicians, including [Democrat] Senator Ted Kennedy, asserted that the bill would not affect US demographic mix.[17] However, the ethnic composition of immigrants changed following the passage of the law.[18][19] Specifically, the [Democrat] Hart–Celler Act allowed increased numbers of people to migrate to the United States from Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Southern and Eastern Europe." Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 - Wikipedia
Democrats certainly must hate American culture, huh?
As a result of the Democrat Immigration act of 1965, the nations that contribute the greatest number of immigrants are not the same ones responsible for the founding of the nation. Case in point, we take more immigrants from Nigeria than we do from Britain.

Now that the left have been successful in targeting the us and europe with dissolution of white peoples , the left have no way or intention of turning off the spigot of inundation from the global demographic which is disproportionately , numerically , racially biased against the us and european nations .

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Immigration and Nationality Act's elimination of national and ethnic quotas has limited recent efforts at immigration restriction. In January 2017, President Donald Trump's Executive Order 13769 temporarily halted immigration from seven majority-Muslim nations.[37] However, lower federal courts ruled that the executive order violated the Immigration and Nationality Act's prohibitions of discrimination on the basis of nationality and religion. In June 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court overrode both appeals courts and allowed the second ban to go into effect, but carved out an exemption for persons with "bona fide relationships" in the U.S. In December 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the full travel ban to take effect, which excludes people who have a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.[38] In June 2018, the Supreme Court upheld the travel ban in Trump v. Hawaii, saying that the president's power to secure the country's borders, delegated by Congress over decades of immigration lawmaking, was not undermined by the president's history of arguably incendiary statements about the dangers he said some Muslims pose to the United States.[39]

* Origins Of Anti-Racist Racist Mind Set To Sack Evil Whitey *

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist? by Peter Wood | NAS

www.nas.org

The twin themes “only whites can be racist” and “all whites are racist” appeared at the University of Delaware in 2007. The “sustainability” dorm-based indoctrination program at UD offered this aperҫu:

A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. ‘The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be racists, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities, or acts of discrimination….’


* Principle Funding Of Left Wing National Socialist Bureaucratic Authoritarianism *

https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Lawful_Permanent_Residents_2013.pdf
Former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Bin Mohamad said in a speech in 1997: "We do have the ultimate weapon. People are more mobile now. They can go anywhere. . . . If we are not allowed a good life in our countries, if we are going to be global citizens, then we should migrate North. We should migrate North in our millions, legally or illegally. Masses of Asians and Africans should inundate Europe and America."
Half a Century of Barely Controlled Immigration
How would he vote, Democrat or Republican?

Much funding for the left wing propaganda and brain washing stems from the fictional ishmaelism terrorist facilitators which continue to seek means to sack the lineages of japheth , having been unsuccessful through the moorons and the peg boy loving otto man .

Pan-Islamism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Pan-Islamism (Arabic: الوحدة الإسلامية‎) is a political ideology advocating the unity of Muslims under one Islamic country or state – often a caliphate[1] – or an international organization with Islamic principles. As a form of internationalism and anti-nationalism, Pan-Islamism differentiates itself from pan-nationalistic ideologies, for example Pan-Arabism, by seeing the ummah (Muslim community) as the focus of allegiance and mobilization, excluding ethnicity and race as primary unifying factors. It portrays Islam as being anti-racist and against anything that divides Muslims based on ethnicity.

Enjoining good and forbidding wrong - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Hisbah (Arabic: حسبة‎ ḥisbah) is an Islamic doctrine which means "accountability".[1] Hisbah is an individual or collective duty (depending on the school of law) to intervene and "enjoin good and forbid wrong" in order to maintain the norms of sharia (Islamic law).
The Hisbah has the following major aspects:[4]

• An obligation of a Muslim.
• An obligation of a state to ensure its citizens comply with hisbah such as sharia.
• In a broader sense, hisbah also refers to the practice of supervision of commercial, guild, and other secular affairs.

Islamic socialism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The concepts of welfare and pension were introduced in early Islamic law as forms of zakat or charity, one of the Five Pillars of Islam, under the Rashidun Caliphate in the 7th century. ... The caliphate can thus be considered the world's first major welfare state.[29][30]

 

[PoliticalChic]

" Definitely A Situation Of Supreme Court Concern "

* Shedding Light On Snowflakes Educated In Political Correctness Of Being Objective As An Excuse For Ignorance *

"Democrat Rep. Michael A. Feighan (OH-20), along with some other Democrats, insisted that "family unification" should take priority over "employability", on the premise that such a weighting would maintain the existing ethnic profile of the country. "
Except that the lying low-life Liberals never wanted to "maintain the existing ethnic profile of the country. "
Their aim was always to replace the American population that no longer voted for them, with a more malleable substitute population.
A little history here.....the Democrat plan was to replace Americans, and the usual immigrants who agreed with American values, with third world immigrants who need welfare and will vote Democrat for same.
Putting their interests before those of America and Americans is nothing new for Democrats.....they hate America and Americans.
Democrats knew what they were doing when they passed the 1965 immigration law that altered the flow from European immigrants to the flood from third world nations.
" Prior to 1965, the demographics of immigration stood as mostly Europeans; 68 percent of legal immigrants in the 1950s came from Europe and Canada.
The proponents of the [Democrat] Hart–Celler Act argued that it would not significantly influence United States culture. [Democrat] President Johnson called the bill "not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions."[16] [Democrat] Secretary of StateDean Rusk and other politicians, including [Democrat] Senator Ted Kennedy, asserted that the bill would not affect US demographic mix.[17] However, the ethnic composition of immigrants changed following the passage of the law.[18][19] Specifically, the [Democrat] Hart–Celler Act allowed increased numbers of people to migrate to the United States from Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Southern and Eastern Europe." Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 - Wikipedia
Democrats certainly must hate American culture, huh?
As a result of the Democrat Immigration act of 1965, the nations that contribute the greatest number of immigrants are not the same ones responsible for the founding of the nation. Case in point, we take more immigrants from Nigeria than we do from Britain.

Now that the left have been successful in targeting the us and europe with dissolution of white peoples , the left have no way or intention of turning off the spigot of inundation from the global demographic which is disproportionately , numerically , racially biased against the us and european nations .

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Immigration and Nationality Act's elimination of national and ethnic quotas has limited recent efforts at immigration restriction. In January 2017, President Donald Trump's Executive Order 13769 temporarily halted immigration from seven majority-Muslim nations.[37] However, lower federal courts ruled that the executive order violated the Immigration and Nationality Act's prohibitions of discrimination on the basis of nationality and religion. In June 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court overrode both appeals courts and allowed the second ban to go into effect, but carved out an exemption for persons with "bona fide relationships" in the U.S. In December 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the full travel ban to take effect, which excludes people who have a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.[38] In June 2018, the Supreme Court upheld the travel ban in Trump v. Hawaii, saying that the president's power to secure the country's borders, delegated by Congress over decades of immigration lawmaking, was not undermined by the president's history of arguably incendiary statements about the dangers he said some Muslims pose to the United States.[39]

* Origins Of Anti-Racist Racist Mind Set To Sack Evil Whitey *

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist? by Peter Wood | NAS

www.nas.org

The twin themes “only whites can be racist” and “all whites are racist” appeared at the University of Delaware in 2007. The “sustainability” dorm-based indoctrination program at UD offered this aperҫu:

A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. ‘The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be racists, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities, or acts of discrimination….’


* Principle Funding Of Left Wing National Socialist Bureaucratic Authoritarianism *

https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Lawful_Permanent_Residents_2013.pdf
Former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Bin Mohamad said in a speech in 1997: "We do have the ultimate weapon. People are more mobile now. They can go anywhere. . . . If we are not allowed a good life in our countries, if we are going to be global citizens, then we should migrate North. We should migrate North in our millions, legally or illegally. Masses of Asians and Africans should inundate Europe and America."
Half a Century of Barely Controlled Immigration
How would he vote, Democrat or Republican?

Much funding for the left wing propaganda and brain washing stems from the fictional ishmaelism terrorist facilitators which continue to seek means to sack the lineages of japheth , having been unsuccessful through the moorons and the peg boy loving otto man .

Pan-Islamism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Pan-Islamism (Arabic: الوحدة الإسلامية‎) is a political ideology advocating the unity of Muslims under one Islamic country or state – often a caliphate[1] – or an international organization with Islamic principles. As a form of internationalism and anti-nationalism, Pan-Islamism differentiates itself from pan-nationalistic ideologies, for example Pan-Arabism, by seeing the ummah (Muslim community) as the focus of allegiance and mobilization, excluding ethnicity and race as primary unifying factors. It portrays Islam as being anti-racist and against anything that divides Muslims based on ethnicity.

Enjoining good and forbidding wrong - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Hisbah (Arabic: حسبة‎ ḥisbah) is an Islamic doctrine which means "accountability".[1] Hisbah is an individual or collective duty (depending on the school of law) to intervene and "enjoin good and forbid wrong" in order to maintain the norms of sharia (Islamic law).
The Hisbah has the following major aspects:[4]

• An obligation of a Muslim.
• An obligation of a state to ensure its citizens comply with hisbah such as sharia.
• In a broader sense, hisbah also refers to the practice of supervision of commercial, guild, and other secular affairs.

Islamic socialism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The concepts of welfare and pension were introduced in early Islamic law as forms of zakat or charity, one of the Five Pillars of Islam, under the Rashidun Caliphate in the 7th century. ... The caliphate can thus be considered the world's first major welfare state.[29][30]

For me, it is all about values.....I don't care how many immigrants the county accepts, as long as they conform to the values and attitudes that made this country great.

I may not be white, but I am more American than Democrat voters are.

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Gluttony Of Pointless Human Populations Recreating Stifling Origins "

* Balance Of Numbers Far Exceeded With Purposeless Additional Numbers *

For me, it is all about values.....I don't care how many immigrants the county accepts, as long as they conform to the values and attitudes that made this country great.

The rate in immigration is far too rapid to be irrelevant , and there is not an economic basis and the immigration influx which ultimately compounds unemployment and contempt .

There are not checks and balances within the immigration schema to discern between those whose alliances are for individualism versus those whose alliances are for bureaucratic dictates .

Any supposed obligation that us citizens have been conned into performing because of the evil whitey scapegoat no longer exists given the comparative arrivals , and there are adverse ecological consequences for population gluttony .

Modern Immigration Wave Brings 59 Million to U.S., Driving Population Growth and Change Through 2065

The nation's foreign-born population has swelled from 10 million in 1965 to a record 45 million in 2015. By 2065, the U.S. will have a projected 78 million immigrants.

www.pewresearch.org

At the time, relatively few anticipated the size or demographic impact of the post-1965 immigration flow (Gjelten, 2015). In absolute numbers, the roughly 59 million immigrants who arrived in the U.S. between 1965 and 2015 exceed those who arrived in the great waves of European-dominated immigration during the 19th and early 20th centuries. Between 1840 and 1889, 14.3 million immigrants came to the U.S., and between 1890 and 1919, an additional 18.2 million arrived (see Table 1 for details).

Looking ahead, new Pew Research Center U.S. population projections show that if current demographic trends continue, future immigrants and their descendants will be an even bigger source of population growth. Between 2015 and 2065, they are projected to account for 88% of the U.S. population increase, or 103 million people, as the nation grows to 441 million.


* Breeding Into Poverty And Too Retarded To Stop *

Chapter 2: Immigration’s Impact on Past and Future U.S. Population Change

Foreign-born Americans and their descendants have been the main driver of U.S. population growth, as well as of national racial and ethnic change, since

www.pewresearch.org

The nation’s population grew by 131 million people from 1965 to 2015, and 72 million of them are linked to immigration—that is, they are immigrants who arrived during this period or they are their children or grandchildren.

If no immigrants had entered the country after 1965, when the U.S. population numbered 193 million, the nation’s population still would have grown—to 252 million people by 2015, rather than 324 million. The population would have grown by less than half as much as it actually did (30% vs. 67% growth).

Over the next five decades, the U.S. immigrant population of 45 million is projected to grow to a record 78 million.9 The growth rate of 74% will be more than double that for the U.S.-born population (30%).

Foreign-born U.S. residents will make up 18% of the population by 2065, higher than the previous record share of nearly 15% during the late 19th- and early 20th-century wave of immigration. The U.S.-born children of immigrants—the second generation—will more than double in number by 2065, from 38 million to 81 million, and will become 18% of the total population.

Since 1965, when the U.S. had 9.6 million immigrants, the total foreign-born population has more than quadrupled. The growth rate rose for each 10-year period from 1965 to 1995, peaking at 56% growth from 1985 to 1995. The volume of immigration grew from 1995 to 2005, though the growth rate of the foreign born decreased slightly (49%). From 2005 to 2015, the growth rate of the foreign born declined substantially, to 17%, largely because of a sharp drop in unauthorized immigration, especially from Mexico (Passel, Cohn and Gonzalez-Barrera, 2012).

* *

I may not be white, but I am more American than Democrat voters are.

Democrat voters have embrace authoritarian government , which is why it should be confronted with the reality of their hypocrisy , whereby it is disingenuous and a disservice to call them liberals .

As libertarianism ( liberalism - liberty of individual choice) and authoritarianism ( conservatism - government dictates ) are antonyms , the left embrace of the bureaucratic collective over individualism is an ideological distinction between an american and an intellectual degenerate .


* Definitely Psychopaths With Misguided Intentions Paving Weighs To Hell *

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

The uppity left is hell bent on aggrandizing the criminal thug .

The religion of secular humanism is exercising its church of government bureaucracy by demanding that the evil whitey scapegoat implement self deprecation to save the hue mammon animal from all of its ills except for the gluttony of its over population that causes all of them .

* Charts Of Woe *

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Levels Beyond Any Obligation Or Necessity "

* Homogeneous Autonomous And Numerically Over Represented *

Population : 4.463 billion