Another absurd proposal from President Biden

[BackAgain]

Biden wants to propose a Constitutional amendment to “reverse” the SCOTUS decision on Presidential Immunity.

Biden to push for constitutional amendment next week to reverse Trump immunity decision: report — Fox News

President Biden is reportedly set to propose major changes to the Constitution on Monday in response to recent Supreme Court decisions he has criticized.

apple.news

Just as we don’t believe in ex post facto laws, so too we don’t accept ex post facto Constitutional Amendments designed to impact just one individual.

Thankfully, it won’t matter. No such proposal to amend the Constitution is going to get enacted or passed or ratified, anyway.

In fact, even if it were to somehow get ratified, it would only impact future Presidents.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Biden wants to propose a Constitutional amendment to “reverse” the SCOTUS decision on Presidential Immunity.

Biden to push for constitutional amendment next week to reverse Trump immunity decision: report — Fox News

President Biden is reportedly set to propose major changes to the Constitution on Monday in response to recent Supreme Court decisions he has criticized.

apple.news

Just as we don’t believe in ex post facto laws, so too we don’t accept ex post facto Constitutional Amendments designed to impact just one individual.

Thankfully, it won’t matter. No such proposal to amend the Constitution is going to get enacted or passed or ratified, anyway.

In fact, even if it were to somehow get ratified, it would only impact future Presidents.

"Democracy"

 

[BackAgain]

"Democracy"

What about democracy?

 

[shockedcanadian]

What about democracy?

Do you have different branches of government or are you harkening back to the Monarchy of kings and queens?

They should reverse it and then immediately arrest any president who used a drone to kill without congress approval.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The president has always had immunity for official acts committed while President. Twisted terrorist democrats are pretending this is brand new.

 

[Michael1985]

99% of suggested amendments don't go anywhere. This is no different.

 

[BluesLegend]

Biden wants to propose a Constitutional amendment to “reverse” the SCOTUS decision on Presidential Immunity.

Biden to push for constitutional amendment next week to reverse Trump immunity decision: report — Fox News

President Biden is reportedly set to propose major changes to the Constitution on Monday in response to recent Supreme Court decisions he has criticized.

apple.news

Just as we don’t believe in ex post facto laws, so too we don’t accept ex post facto Constitutional Amendments designed to impact just one individual.

Thankfully, it won’t matter. No such proposal to amend the Constitution is going to get enacted or passed or ratified, anyway.

In fact, even if it were to somehow get ratified, it would only impact future Presidents.

That fool couldn't even rally the support of his own party to keep his nomination let alone muster the votes to amend the Constitution.

 

[BluesLegend]

The president has always had immunity for official acts committed while President. Twisted terrorist democrats are pretending this is brand new.

Trump and team MAGA have unhinged the Democrats. I have never seen them so full of rage and bitterness.

 

[OKTexas]

Biden wants to propose a Constitutional amendment to “reverse” the SCOTUS decision on Presidential Immunity.

Biden to push for constitutional amendment next week to reverse Trump immunity decision: report — Fox News

President Biden is reportedly set to propose major changes to the Constitution on Monday in response to recent Supreme Court decisions he has criticized.

apple.news

Just as we don’t believe in ex post facto laws, so too we don’t accept ex post facto Constitutional Amendments designed to impact just one individual.

Thankfully, it won’t matter. No such proposal to amend the Constitution is going to get enacted or passed or ratified, anyway.

In fact, even if it were to somehow get ratified, it would only impact future Presidents.

Yep, it will never happen. Hell it won't even make it through congress.

.

 

[BackAgain]

Do you have different branches of government or are you harkening back to the Monarchy of kings and queens?

We have a Constitutional republic. It is not a “democracy.”

Thanks for asking.

They should reverse it and then immediately arrest any president who used a drone to kill without congress approval.

Right now Obumbler should be very grateful for the SCOTUS decision.

 

[BluesLegend]

Yep, it will never happen. Hell it won't even make it through congress.

.

.

Breaking: Biden to also propose banning uncle cannibalism.

 

[rightwinger]

So, a President who would be protected by the Supreme Courts Presidential Immunity opposes it

The Supreme Courts decision to protect any President from criminal prosecution can be protected as long as he claims it is an “Official Act”
Even if it is a criminal act

 

[IM2]

That fool couldn't even rally the support of his own party to keep his nomination let alone muster the votes to amend the Constitution.

Except he did rally the support of his party to keep his nomination dumb ass.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Trump and team MAGA have unhinged the Democrats. I have never seen them so full of rage and bitterness.

They are tired of working so hard to destroy the country and failing.

 

[rightwinger]

The president has always had immunity for official acts committed while President. Twisted terrorist democrats are pretending this is brand new.

No they haven’t

They have never had protection from criminal acts even as part of an official act

Now, they do

 

[EvilCat Breath]

So, a President who would be protected by the Supreme Courts Presidential Immunity opposes it

The Supreme Courts decision to protect any President from criminal prosecution can be protected as long as he claims it is an “Official Act”
Even if it is a criminal act

Not if a president claims it is an official act. It has to be an official act. This has always been the law.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

No they haven’t

They have never had protection from criminal acts even as part of an official act

Now, they do

Go back to wherever taught you con law and get your money back.

 

[rightwinger]

Go back to wherever taught you con law and get your money back.

Show me in the Supreme Court Decision where it specifically excludes criminal acts performed as part of an Official Act

 

[Votto]

Do you have different branches of government or are you harkening back to the Monarchy of kings and queens?

They should reverse it and then immediately arrest any president who used a drone to kill without congress approval.

No matter the Constitution or the law, only Republicans can be targeted.

That's how it works in the Swamp.

 

[rightwinger]

Not if a president claims it is an official act. It has to be an official act. This has always been the law.

A President can always claim something was an “official act” to hide criminal activity