Recent content by Zavulon

As if one American regime is much different from another. The difference between anti-Obama and anti-Trump covers of "The Medal for capturing Washington" is mostly cosmetical. From Photoshop to neuroslop. It's not about if we do like Trump, Obama or Bush. It's about self-preservation and...

You simply don't have enough bombs to exterminate them all.

Russis is threatening to use nukes, if necessary, since 1949. And if we are talking about specifically Putin and Ukrainian crisis, he mentioned nukes in his very first speech of SMO declaration. We prefer to achieve our goals by causing minimally possible damage. But we are going to achieve them...

They became democracies after "brutal dictators" were removed, didn't they? Not necessarily. As I said, it mostly depends on how to use them. So, half of Americans agree to pay the price that high for keeping their "freedom". It's up to decide to Iranians. And absolute majority of Iranian...

One more time. It's not up to me, nor to you, to "justify" Iranian regime. It's up to Iranians and only to them. And all what I said, is that I do understand why they do prefer their current regime to the modern situation in Iraq, Libya, Syria or even America and even ready to fight and die by...

In Iran's system there is much lesser amount of deaths from both overdose and fire-arms incidents. It has it's advantages, at least from the Iranian point of view. Anyway, you do justify hundreds of thousands deaths of American citizens, because, as far I understand, you believe it worth it. Right?

Definitely yes. Especially given the examples of Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan and other "democratised" countries. Not necessarily they will die, especially if Iran use it wisely - for deterrence or for the counter-force strike. Actually no. Examples of Iraq, Syria, Lybia and Ukraine, show...

Don't you justify death of hundreds of thousands because of overdose or because of firearms shootings? If the government makes a decision that now drug-dealers and gunowners have right to kill people (or just don't make measures to prevent it), it still government's decision and government is...

If you nuke Iranian cities without nuking Iranian nuclear forces, there will be two consequences: 1) Survived part of Iranian nuclear forces attack the USA, and millions of Americans are dying for no reason. 2) at the very least, such an attack will mean absolute end of NPT and busted nuclear...

It's better to kill tens of thousands than lose millions. Anyway, in America half of population believes that tens of thousands dying from overdose is an acceptable price for the freedom of drug usage and another half believes that death of tens of thousands from firearms is acceptable price for...

And it's lesser evil than allow them to make a revolution and kill millions.

First: If Iran have nukes, it's doesn't mean that they are going immediately nuke Tel-Aviv. As any other countries, Iran is more interested in yhe defence of Iranian lives, not in butchering Israeli civilians. So, their first strike will be against Israel's nuclear forces, and in the moment when...

JCPOA had an end date. But NPT didn't. And Trump effectively destroyed not only JCPOA, but NPT, either.

One more time. Why North Korea don't use nukes against South Korea, or France don't use nukes against Spain? Why those nuclear states don't feel themsleves to do whatever they want on Korean Peninsula or in Europe? It's quite simple and universal for everyone - Roman-Catholics, Atheists...

As I said, Russia (at least it's current leadership) believes in the possibility of the more or less peaceful rolling back of NATO forces, and establishing the system of equal safety for everyone, at least in Europe.