Recent content by xBiophagex

Rights are guaranteed to human beings. Being a child is not a prerequisite to being a person.

What you are describing is what I call convenient morality. It allows you to impose upon others standards you do not wish imposed upon yourself. If the right to life is paramount, then the reason for death is irrelevant. If you deny me the use of your body and, as a result, I die, then I have...

Where am I granted a 'right to my body'? But yes, your right to life supersedes every one of my rights. As an example, you cannot kill someone who breaks into your house unless they represent a threat to your life. Ignoring for a moment the fact that the mother's actions are directly...

No, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed the Constitutional right to privacy, prohibiting the state from violating that right by denying a woman access to legal abortion services. Griswold/Roe/Casey is settled and accepted case law, and it is the law of the land. Given your clear ignorance of...

Ah, it would appear you got that from dictionary.com. You really believe that a definition that you apparently got from a website stands up against the latest edition of the official legal dictionary the courts use, and webster which also defines person as 'A human being.'? Not to mention that...

I don't know what dictionary you got that out of, but as I said Black's Law dictionary 9th edition is the official dictionary involved. And person is a legal term, so if you didn't get that out of a legal dictionary then it's quite pointless.

Black's Law Dictionary 9th edition is the legal dictionary used by the higher courts. It defines a person as: A human being.

You stated that you do not believe that an unborn is a person, which is in disagreement with my first post.

Feel free to point out at any point where I've injected philosophy or religion into the issue. As I wrote in the first post, Black's Law Dictionary 9th edition, the law dictionary used by the higher courts, states, Person: A human being. The courts simply denied unborns their most important right.

Again, feel free to provide evidence that the things you mentioned are prerequisites for being considered a human being or person. What you or I 'feel', is irrelevant. Countless medical textbooks have stated that an unborn is a human being from the moment of conception, and thus a person. It's...

Feel free to provide some evidence that an unborn is anything other than a person from conception. As I stated in the first post, being a human being is enough qualification to being considered a legal person.

As I've stated, according to Black's Law Dictionary 9th edition, Person: Human Being. If you acknowledge that an unborn is a human being, then you have to acknowledge that it's a person.

There is a hierarchy of rights, and the right to life supersedes every other right. For instance, if someone breaks into your garage and begins to steal your car, you cannot shoot them unless they're presenting some direct threat to your life.

Feel free to provide any credible science to suggest that doing any of the above is a prerequisite to being considered a human being, and thus a person.

Can any pro-choicer provide credible science that an unborn is anything other than a human, and thus legal person? Black's Law Dictionary 9th edition, Person: A human being. Nealis v. Baird, 996 P.2d 438, 453 (Okla. 1999) “Contemporary scientific precepts accept as a given that a human...