Recent content by WUN

One incident of this is one too many. Sorry to reject your weak attempt at sweeping this under the rug. This went to court even though the prosecution never had much of a case to begin with. You can't and shouldn't win cases in court based primarily on emotion and that is what the prosecution...

Watching and following is not 'stalking'. The legal definition of stalking is repeated/multiple episodes of following someone over a certain time. He followed him once and he was within his legal right to do so. Also, someone merely following you does not give you right to assault them.

You don't think the government would have looked monumentally guilty if Snowden was assassinated? He would have gone someplace where there were plenty of witnesses.

Yet he used no racist language on the 911 calls and the only one shown to use racist language at this point in the trial is Trayvon Martin (thanks to the prosecution's star witness), calling Zimmerman a "creepy azz cracker".

The witnesses attempting to malign george zimmerman are being discredited for their lies, inconsistencies and bias. The prosecution witnesses that don't have an axe to grind are bolstering Zimmerman's explanation and showing that he is not a monster, but a person who was in a desperate...

Except Zimmerman is not on trial for violating HOA rules and disobeying those rules does not mean his intent was to murder. Try again. Was he actually on watch duty at that particular time? No, he wasn't. It was his own private time and he is allowed to legally carry his weapon, while on watch...

They asked people to stay indoors and shut down public transportation for not even a whole day. The reason was to prevent his escape. And because they lifted the stay indoors ban in Watertown, that what was caused him to be caught. But the fact that they were able to get people to stay indoors...

No, I'm talking about ALL Christians and ALL muslims, whether they are in the U.S. or elsewhere. Muslims bombed London too amoung other places. Maybe you should look into it a little more.

I'm not denying what motivated him, the point is that you have one U.S. private citizen vs. hundreds of terrorist acts committed around the world (not just the U.S.) perpetrated by Muslim private citizens. This is no way means that all Muslims are like that, but per capita they have more...

I would think anyone who watches TV regularly or saw 'Almost Famous' would catch that mistake on their own. Do you know how many times news stations have embarrassingly put the wrong picture with the wrong caption?

You mean these pooches in these pictures from Watertown? I don't know if they're all the same dog, but they had some there. They literally had thousands of police officers and they probably didn't want to see the dogs get shot...

Now if you had posted your picture in there instead of his, then we'd have a suspicious looking character subject to profiling, regardless of your skin tone or ethnic background.

Iraq and Afghanistan were wars by a government/military. You won't be able to come up with a single example of Christian private citizens going to foreign countries that are predominantly muslim and killing people indiscrimantly.

The CIA is a U.S. government agency, they are not 'civilians'. They may be considered 'civil servants', but to call them civilians is ludicrous. The CIA is part of the executive branch of government. I'm talking about private citizens unaffiliated with the military or government. Good luck...

Ok, you have one guy who killed two people (one by a heart attack) and injured 111 Let's compare with muslim religious rampages in just the U.S. alone: These brothers killed 3 people and wounded over 180. Then you have the muslim officer who went crazy at Fort Dix and shot several people...