Recent content by usfan

If you say so. I'm sure this is no place for me, then, if sabotage takes the place of reason, & ridicule replaces logic. I'm too old & too cranky to put up with a lot of shit, so probably best for me to mosey along. Thanks to everyone for a few interesting exchanges, & good luck.

Well, looks like my participation was short lived. I choose not to contribute to a forum that supports on view over another with moderator power. Maybe someday i'll analyze why this takes place.

There is plenty of information, websites, links, & rebuttals that refute your quote. We are back to an argument by assertion, with no real evidence being submitted. I can easily say the exact same thing about your 'political shit of the leftwing of the democratic party'.. but how is that an...

I started a thread on evolution in the CDZ. In spite of my calls to return to the topic, one poster kept deflecting with ad hominem & personal attacks. So the thread was closed. Why should the disruption of one poster cause the whole debate to shut down? If this is merely ideological support...

Translation: I don't have any evidence, so i'll deflect with indignation & provide logical fallacies to hide the impotence of my arguments. Is that how this game is played? ..kind of lame, if you ask me. I think i will bow out of this 'game', & wait for some rational posters who want to...

Since there seems to be a drift from the topic, i though i would remind what it is, & call for actual rebuttal on the points listed, instead of handwaving assertions.

Ooo.. is that some real righteous indignation? Yet you accuse me of being religious? :rolleyes: Still dogmatic religious assertions, without any scientific evidence. It is sad, really. You want to deflect with a flame war, & are doing your best to provoke me. That can be done in another...

Is not! Is too! Nuh uh! Uh huh! That is all arguments of assertion are. If someone is making a scientific claim.. a 'theory'.. then they post their studies, describe their methodology, & post their conclusions for review. It is up to them to provide evidence for their claim, not for others...

Still no evidence. Just ad hominem. Dodging the issue, deflecting from the topic, & ignoring the real problems of science & logic. I can point this out from time to time, but it does NOT contribute anything to the discussion. It evades it.

Links & youtube videos are not evidence. They do not rebut anything. They can be sources if you are making a point, but posting links & videos is not an argument. If you know of any real evidence that supports the theory, post it, with the data sets & conditions of the tests. But all i have...

..and a bad theory, at that. The actual evidence does not support it. There is no mechanism that forces or even allows the jumps in the genetic code that are asserted.

So you assert without evidence. You have no proof of this being even possible, much less any observable evidence for it. What you assert without evidence, i will dismiss without evidence.

I am going to ignore your arguments of ad hominem. If you that is all you have, please continue & enjoy yourself. But i will debate the issue, not wrangle about words, definitions, & personal ridicule.

That was my obvious point. That you wish to deflect with ridicule says more about your lack of arguments. The subject was reproductive isolation, & i used the donkey/horse line as an example of that phenomena. Your mockery is just another deflection to divert attention from the lack of...

If you cannot see the difference between minor changes in variation, & major changes in the genetic code, you are so invested in your beliefs that reason escapes you. There is an OBVIOUS difference, & NO mechanism proposed to make such changes. Time is not enough. Time has no power or...