Recent content by Tuckwolf

Exactly!! That's why we should give them everything. Let the rich rebuild the roads if they want to and then charge everyone whatever they like to drive on them. Let them decide whether or no to establish clean water standards. Let them decide whether or not the food industries should be able to...

My you're so irritable when agrees with read my last post newbie. I daresay I've been around about 40 years longer than you have. And by the way, agreeing with you is by necessity exactly the same mocking you. It was of course entirely unnecessary, you mock yourself every time you say something...

Just for the sake of entertainment. Do you why we even have a Constitution. I mean obviously we much better off under the Articles of Confederation which also provided Canada with statehood and a President whom is never mentioned in our history books.

You're absolutely right. There's no such thing as science. It's just another belief system and nothing good has ever come from it. Only evil destruction disease and famine.

As long as they're money doing and paying no taxes that's all that matters.

Good idea. Let's do away with all spending and all taxes. Privatize everything including the military. If you're really serious about what you're asking this makes perfect sense. I say put your mouth where you're money is.

Excellent thread. Keep up the good work.

I have to say I like picture of Ted Cruz in clown make-up it's appropriate to say the least, although I'm quite sure what point you're trying to make on this particular thread.

Troll

No. I consider them to be wrong. more later

Before I respond to your question I should mention that my post ending with the word aggrieved wasn't finished. Malware bytes popped up in the middle of the word and the thing got posted before I finished. I'm still not sure how but I did an edit as soon as the anti-malware program did it's...

Not at all. Certain events in a celebrity's life would of course be news worthy because everybody knows about them because of what they do. But then it becomes a question for all of us to answer: How much of this "news" is everybody's business and how much of it is a matter of personal affairs...

I would go so far as to apply the right to privacy to all non-politician celebrities. To me that's going far at all. Movie stars for example are generally thought of as owing success to popularity and therefore sacrifice right to privacy. I absolutely, vociferously at times, disagree and I...

Well said.

The right is expressed. Jeez, don't you people read?