Recent content by talanum1

See thread: "Proof of "Axioms" of Propositional Logic: Synopsis" for the meaning of the symbols. We have the axiom (A:O): (p)-(+)-( )-(+)-(~p) <-> (), where "()" is the empty structure which evaluates to "false". From this we can prove: p, ~p OR C -> C as follows: Line # Statement...

Infinity is not pinned down: what if you can pair more than one real number with the infinite natural number?

You can have a set specified by a rule and then specify that the rule keeps making new elements indefinitely.

Not fictional like we cannot believe in it.

Mathematics is supposed to be precise and independent of a particular mind. Therefore one of their i's must be fictional.

Suppose I tell you there is another number 5 distinct from 5: isn't this fictional?

I am serious: it's numbers on God's computer.

Don't be ridiculous.

Numbers on a computer.

If spacetime exists, space must exist. You can't combine nothing with time to get anything other than time.

Fictional values then?

What can i, j and k be equal to?

I can't seem to wrap my head around that. For that to happen the numbers must be different if read left-right than right-left.

The model must satisfy the axioms. Say: sqrt (i^2) = i, sqrt (j^2) = (i+j)/sqrt(2) and sqrt(k^2) = (i-j)/sqrt(2) is a representation of the model. Then: ijk = i (-1+1)/sqrt(2)^2 = 0 not = -1.

"are electron still point particles that display characteristics of being pointless? like no shape or size?" Only up to scales of 10^(-19)m.