Why not? And how do those facts tell a different story? The Levites would have been with the lost ten tribes when the Northern Kingdom was captured and then escaped. We know that they escaped to the "north countries" and very well could be Eastern Europe.
It makes perfect sense that this...
They most certainly DO NOT receive a "free" education. There is NOTHING free about it. What's more, the fact that the state forces them into a state-run re-education camp does not mean the state now has ownership of those children. It just means the state has limited the parents' ability to...
You could not be more wrong or any more poorly educated. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about, but instead are just regurgitating what someone told you once. Try reading the book. The "live in harmony" stage was nothing but Marx's interpretation of the state and the populace...
Thank you for proving you have utterly no Earthly idea what you are talking about. No, Marxism does not call for a "stateless" society. It calls for a society where the state IS the society. That you do not know this indicates that you have an extremely superficial understanding of what Marx...
That seems to be a common thread for those like you. A Marxist believes in the supremacy of the state and the subornation of the individual to the state in all things, property, wealth, and even children. The idea that the state, or the "community" has primacy over children before parents is a...
No, they aren't. But they are born with the right to defend themselves and choose whatever religion they want. There is no such natural right to gay marriage.
More revisionist history. First of all, there was never a fight over "privacy" in the 70s, it was a fight to legalize abortion. Nothing more. And it was the Democrats who were pushing segregation and Jim Crow laws. You honestly don't have a clue what you are talking about.
And gay...
The 60s was "centuries" ago? Really? You are just desperate now. And you elected a puppet. Nothing more. If he wasn't one of your owned slaves on your plantation you would never have elected him. Any black that strays off of the Democrat plantation is hunted and lynched.
Dude, what party do you think the Confederates were? What party was Bull Conner? Now, what party was Lincoln? A higher percentage of GOP voted for the Civil Rights Bill than did a percent of Dems. Just how illiterate of history are you?
Democrats have always been the party of slavery and segregation. Who do you think ran the South for all those years? And nothing has changed. The Dems STILL demand the black population serve them on the Democrat plantation. None are allowed to leave.
Is this the part where realize you got caught in your false-civil rights spin and try to pivot to something that has NOTHING to do with the original topic?