Recent content by ShaklesOfBigGov

I simply presented that there is a clear difference between sharing an “opinion” with how one looks at the approach to seeking out a law’s “original intent”. This is typically how cases are presented and facts based when rendering a Supreme Court decision - original intent of the law during the...

So while I can site an earlier United States Supreme Court ruling you somehow claim (without evidence) Supreme Court overreach, .. yet you’re clinging to a New York Times Article, Chris Christie opinion, and New World Order conspiracies as more relevant to the original intent. You can NOT be...

If you are (as you simply put it) the original citing source, then you are expressing nothing more than unsupported opinion. An opinion that CAN be rejected as holding no real weight in (1) the face of facts supported by dictation from a High Court Judge or (2) expressed quoted views from those...

You’re definitely not going to find if you happen to be skimming across and throwing up some 3 second “quick links” to Wikipedia, with their “Cliff Notes” summaries. True research takes more time, detailed and deeper references, with sources that carry a little more credibility than that to...

So what legal and Constitutional credentials does University of Minnnesot Human Rights Library carry that’s relevant to the discussion of Constitutional legitimacy of Immigration enforcment as it pertains to Constitutional law? Now listing the actual dictation views of a judge, with a proven...

Did we forget the omnibus HUGE spending plan that Trump signed because he wanted to fund our troops? A spending plan Trump said he never wanted to see again, yet Chuck Schumer praised as good for the country? Hard to have deficit reduction when a certain party likes to outspend the revenue...

Like the confidence you had in Hillary?

We are not taking about adding socialized medicine with increased Federal red tape Bureaucracy, or adding more gun regulations legislation, this is surrounding customs enforcement of immigration laws already passed and signed into law.

The only straight up lie, is your claim that an enforced southern border would interfere with those who wish to do business and work in the United States. I asked how exactly an enforced northern border inhibits foreigners from doing business in the United States.. or of those foreigners coming...

The unprovable position is the claim border enforcement on southern border, which is the same as those designated entry points already used in our northern border ... interferes with and interferes with the freedom to do business and work in the United States. A total BS unproven argument on...

I’m a dumb ass for stating we have a northern border as well that Canada and the United States both use in establishing points of entry and requirements of foreigners? A border, by the way, that does not hinder foreign business and those who wish to do business in the United States. A border...

Turning to racist statements like “hating brown people” does not AID in your position. IN FACT those who make judgment views using racially charged sentiments (such as yourself) DO SO because they can no longer defend their argument with any amount of provided research that backs their case...

So when Canada and the United States imposes specific customs “check points” locations on their border, the requirement to provide a passport, go through a series of questions and possibly be required to submit to car inspections. Are they, in any way, violating this concept of God given...

When they run out of supportive facts they can provide and go to, they turn to their racism and bigotry comments. I’m not at all surprised by this.

Prove to me where my link and view is found to be inaccurate with what I provided. You’re the one making a statement based without facts.