Recent content by rylah

Isaac Accords and South America

Contradictions between dogma and the text of Genesis, are not a matter of interpretation, but of collective archetype. Jung once observed, that macho men tend to be their wives' poodles.

Do you understand the difference between the discussion of individual beliefs, and religious dogma, versus text examination? Both text and dogma can be examined objectively, while subjective personal beliefs are irrelevant to conceptual examination.

Read the text again. It distinguishes what each ate. If you see everything as allegory, there shouldn't be a problem to tell how a tree is different from the fruit. And 'expulsion' is only referred to Adam.

Again personal belief is irrelevant. The false framing of Eve for the "fall of man", and the association of reproduction/birth with sin, are part of the Church dogma, and corruption of text. While God judged the 6th day not only 'good', but "very good."

Indeed, the identity of the beasts beheading 'infidels', is only a mystery to the basement tinfoil hats.

The legislation refers to education. No 'religion' or 'courts' are mentioned.

Eve chose for humanity the option to be righteous. And the work in that context is not forced, but the opportunity desired by God. Stop blaming Eve and be grateful, that's all.

That's the same root as 'design' and 'stimulation' עצב - לעצב

From the Jewish perspective, solus feel ashamed with 'free bread', and humanity should be grateful to Eve.

Yes that is in fact a blessing, even excitement. Perhaps God should've asked the pope how to phrase it better...

So return from outer space, and try to focus on the text. Does God call it "punishment"?

What if I give you a Jewish website about flat earth? There's a reason you can't find the word "punishment" in the text.

No, that's your corruption of the text. So much for accountability.

Where does this insecurity Does God call it "punishment"?