rstrats's latest activity

  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Please explain where the Genesis account shows where a daytime or a night time was involved with an event when no part of a daytime or...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Zone1 Maundy Thursday.
    OK, so during the daytime.
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Zone1 Maundy Thursday.
    But again, the first half of the day or the second half of the day?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Even if I did, why would you need to know in order to provide examples?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Zone1 Maundy Thursday.
    Which half?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I said why in post #476. But why do you need to know that in order to show how your AI comments provide actual instances where a...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    OK, since you didn't say your comments were AI generated, I didn't know they were the ones to which you were referring. So, can you...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I don't see where you've said anything about AI. What did it say?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Don't blame me. I didn't force you to post here with all of your off-topic comments, with exception of a couple that you provided that...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Simple curiosity about the lack of a third night. Are you suggesting that every topic on these forums has to somehow be sufficiently...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Are you suggesting that the lack of a third night with a 6th day of the week crucifixion and a first day of the week resurrection has...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Well, I don't see what is dumb about the OP. To what are you referring?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Why are you asking that question?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I do. What is your point?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I agree. Where have I said otherwise?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I have never said that. Show me where I have.
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    To what dumb ass belief are you referring?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I agree with that 100 percent. However, that is an issue for a deferent topic.
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Now I really know that you're just messing with me. Because in the immortal words of John McEnroe, "You can't be serious."
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    ding, Why did you quote my comment from post #451 and then address something else?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I commented on the Esther account in post #443.
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    The Genesis account isn't an example since nothing is said about the number of daytimes or the number of night times that would be...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Zone1 Getting the jump on the Easter debates..
    But if you just go by the account, she seemed to leave to go to the disciples right after seeing that the stone had been removed. So...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Zone1 Getting the jump on the Easter debates..
    Mark 16:2 says that the women came to the tomb when the sun had risen.
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    What? How do you come up with three examples in the Esther account?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Only the Esther account might be one example but that that is dependent on "three days, night or day" meaning the same as "three days...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I agree completely with that. But that's not what this topic is about. It's about the commonality of usage where no part of a day or...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Because it does not show examples (plural) where a daytime or a night time was said to be involved with an event when no part of the...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I don't see where your link show that a night time was said to be involved when no part of a night time could be. Perhaps you could...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    So far that has been true - no one visiting this topic has said that it was common usage. But that doesn't rule out that someone in...
Show older items
Back
Top Bottom