rstrats's latest activity

  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Are you suggesting that the lack of a third night with a 6th day of the week crucifixion and a first day of the week resurrection has...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Well, I don't see what is dumb about the OP. To what are you referring?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Why are you asking that question?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I do. What is your point?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I agree. Where have I said otherwise?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I have never said that. Show me where I have.
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    To what dumb ass belief are you referring?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I agree with that 100 percent. However, that is an issue for a deferent topic.
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Now I really know that you're just messing with me. Because in the immortal words of John McEnroe, "You can't be serious."
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    ding, Why did you quote my comment from post #451 and then address something else?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I commented on the Esther account in post #443.
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    The Genesis account isn't an example since nothing is said about the number of daytimes or the number of night times that would be...
  • R
    But if you just go by the account, she seemed to leave to go to the disciples right after seeing that the stone had been removed. So...
  • R
    Mark 16:2 says that the women came to the tomb when the sun had risen.
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    What? How do you come up with three examples in the Esther account?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Only the Esther account might be one example but that that is dependent on "three days, night or day" meaning the same as "three days...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I agree completely with that. But that's not what this topic is about. It's about the commonality of usage where no part of a day or...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Because it does not show examples (plural) where a daytime or a night time was said to be involved with an event when no part of the...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    I don't see where your link show that a night time was said to be involved when no part of a night time could be. Perhaps you could...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    So far that has been true - no one visiting this topic has said that it was common usage. But that doesn't rule out that someone in...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Since your comments deal with issues for a different topic perhaps you could start a new one.
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Of my 19 posts in pages 19-21 I don't see where I've debated any examples. What do you have in mind?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    What debate have I lost with regards to whether or not any examples provided were actually examples?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    To what debate are you referring?
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    Sounds good.
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    If it's debate if you want, you could start a new topic because the only debate which would be applicable to this one would be with...
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    That's an issue for a different topic. Maybe you might start one.
  • R
    rstrats replied to the thread Matthew 12:40.
    With the new year here, perhaps someone new visiting this topic may know of examples.
  • R
    Any particular reason for quoting the whole post and then only addressing the first comment?
  • R
    The verse doesn't identify the disciple, nor does it say anything about the Messiah entrusting, nor does He call Mary His mother, even...
Back
Top Bottom