Clearly his intent was to present a time-sensitive binary choice for world policy makers--tolerability on one end and Catastrophe on the other. Your comments here seem to be trying to semantically drift his meaning into some sort of relative scale. But since below you admit his claim was...
Well, I called the Bush play didn't I? He tried to lightly scratch Rubio, but he did what he's been doing too much of from the beginning...painfully mumbling it out over two or three news cycles. Rubio didn't take the bait. I think that was it...much of that Bush money is about to move away...
Well now, Mamooth...that's a pretty strong claim: falsifying data. I'll even give you points if you demonstrate the articles' data sources are less reputable than published research. Should be a pretty simple citation to make on your part that the recorded temperature numbers that fall below...
Stellar debate skills, guys. I find it pretty amusing how so many liberals find their own perceived intellectual superiority reducible to junior-high schoolchild taunts.
Anyone who wants to parse the cited article is welcome to read it and decide for themselves how slanted it is. We'll check...