Recent content by Polk

Well, he claims he's a billionaire at least.

Yes, the CIA is conspiring with the party that lost the election and attempting to undermine the new president and start a new Cold War for... reasons?

And you don't see any sort of problem that state legislators get to draw their own district lines?

Well, whoever is behind the character "Guccifer 2.0."

France has never been a significant power? Napoleon would like a word...

They didn't create the Electoral College out of a highminded ideal. It was done to increase the relative power of slave states.

Buchanan literally lost a third the land area of the country.

John McCain... who was literally shot down over Vietnam and spent five years as a POW. Whatever you think of the man's politics, calling him a chickenhawk is absurd.

I'd rather the National Security Adviser make a misleading statement on television that put our intelligence personnel at risk, but clearly you disagree.

Perhaps you should try reading those articles.

http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/289296-guccifer-20-used-russian-language-vpns-to-leak-documents

My question for them is this: If they're so certain there was no wrongdoing, why do they oppose an investigation?

The great thing about the truth is that it doesn't matter if you buy it, it's still the truth. CIA talking points for Susan Rice called Benghazi attack "spontaneously inspired" by protests - CBS News Petraeus Says U.S. Tried to Avoid Tipping Off Terrorists

We have evidence that the Russians were Assange's source and we know that Assange is lying about who his source is. He got the information from a "Romanian" hacker that doesn't speak Romanian and claims to not speak Russia, but uses a Russian-language VPN...

No one seriously believed "Benghazi was over a damn Youtube video." Rice made a knowingly false statement on a talk show because those were the intelligence community's talking points at the time. An accurate assessment at that point would have required exposing CIA assets in the region.