Dude, take a breath, the lack of oxygen is having an effect on your ability to have a rational discussion. You said "What is wrong is your idea that the Constitution or Bill of Rights is the source of legal authority." To which I cheerfully shot it down by telling you that it is. Why? Because it...
It literally is the source. And the Bill of Rights are a part of the Constitution. Not separate as you seem to think. And, it is a completed work that happens to have a built in lawful process to change it. Finally, considering the abject failure of government to conform to the text those rights...
The Bill of Rights extends to every person via the 14th Amendment “…No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; …” That means that not only CONGRESS shall make no law it means States can’t either.
If I were a lawyer...
Actually that is the NINTH Amendment. The Tenth is a specific statement of limitation on the Federal Government. The 9th is the one to explicitly say that not every right is enumerated.
After reading the OP question and responses thru a painfully slow process… The answer to the question is NO. There is no right to privacy in the US Constitution.
The 3rd Amendment says no quartering soldiers in your home.
The 4th Amendment carves out specific areas that cannot be searched sans...
Congress is the direct descendant of Parliament. The House represents the excitable mobs AKA “the people”. The Senate was supposed to represent the States Governments thus giving them a voice in federal affairs. Think of them originally as an Ambassador. We don’t elect Ambassadors to the UN or...
Agreed. Doesn’t make the OP less true. The media has abandoned any pretext of being an unbiased source of information. They’ve chosen sides and wear that choice as openly as a sponsor blurb on a nascar drivers jacket.
The sad part is that he doesn't have to propose anything. He is the day-to-day supervisor of the Federal Government. All he has to say is "*****, knock it off".
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I don't care about regressive or progressive at all. What I care about are your personal freedoms and how the income tax takes them away.
Consider:
In order to tax income, the fed must know (down to the penny) how much and what types of income you have brought in. They do this by forcing...
I don't think Romney has any chance. He's Obama Lite. Lots of folks will refuse to vote for him on principle. I'd wager a coke that if he's nominated the GOP turnout in November will be low.