Recent content by Paperman299

The actual medical community does not share your view that homosexuality is abnormal. So no specific harmful effects? Not one prediction?

Putting words in your mouth?? You know what, you should be so lucky to have my words in your mouth, it'd be the first coherent thing you've said. Stubbornly insisting someone pick one of two childishly simple and absolute views isn't debate, it's just stubborn, and a transparent attempt at...

Funny. Subverting a classic feminist line into something that beings down homosexuals instead of empowering women. Of course, women have hardly taken the line to heart, at least in an absolute sense. (Straight) women continue to seek out and form relationships with men. How appropriate that...

So what you're saying is, you don't have evidence of homosexuality's deleterious effects on society, that it's something you imagined?

Better throw away your cell phone, then, since the system which discovered the basic principles it's founded on is apparently worthless.

There's many genes that are beneficial which need not be immediately expressed. Carrying the genetics for homosexuality and expressing it selectively can have benefits for a population as a whole, ie caretaking. Now where's this current, reputable, peer-reviewed scientific evidence of...

Bert was the only muppet on that show with any sense. He'd get my vote.

So in your mind it has just nothing, nothing to do with two people who love each other and won't settle for a demonstrably inferior "civil union?"

The wording of the question is "Should Society Accept Homosexuality?" In fact, it's right there at the top of the poll. This disingenuous tactic of demanding to have your hand held through every tedious step of the discussion is getting tiring, as is your insistence on vacillating between...

Wal-Mart: "Slave Wages Now Less Slave-y" Meanwhile, Wal-Mart now heavily favors part-time workers who they give 38 hours to avoid paying out benefits. But let's all celebrate that America's largest employer still doesn't pay a living wage!

People didn't acknowledge homosexuality exists, they said they were okay with it. And how can you continue to demand proof of the changing opinion of equal marriage specifically when the last three pages of this thread have been about nothing but? If you have confidence in your theological...

Gay people who don't yet have their Constitutionally-guaranteed right to equal treatment under the law right now are much comforted that Christians are working on changing their own opinion.

Like it or not, Jeb Bush is your candidate with the broadest appeal (right now). Conservatives may like other candidates more intensely, but Jeb has the widest range of some like.

Discover this truth faster, please.

First, I clearly said ancient religious texts were no basis for legal exceptions because they were ancient religious texts. I even quoted it, people can read that, so I don't know why you think you can straw man me on this point. Perhaps for the same reason you think you can continue to claim...