Recent content by Open Bolt

Scientists keep putting out studies that support it. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Nuclear-Winter-Responses-to-Nuclear-War-Between-the-Coupe-Bardeen/560033106c2d599bcace3ce4cb6c67d5b713ec50 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774726/...

Better dead than red.

Russia keeps building new ones to replace the ones that go bad.

Russia is further away from developing hypersonic weapons than the US is. And even if they had them, that wouldn't help them defeat Ukraine.

That is incorrect. The scientific community continues to support nuclear winter to this day. https://thebulletin.org/2022/10/nowhere-to-hide-how-a-nuclear-war-would-kill-you-and-almost-everyone-else/

Your scenario goes off the rails at this point. The US would respond with hundreds of nuclear warheads against Russia and hundreds of nuclear warheads against China. Mostly against military targets, but China would lose one of their most important cities. America is closer to developing...

If the world let a nuclear weapons state get away with using nuclear weapons in an act of aggression against a non-nuclear weapons state, that would be the end of the NPT. All the nations of the world would develop nuclear weapons. Then it would only be a matter of time before someone...

It wasn't actually his theory. But the answer is, he never abandoned it.

Russia does not have hypersonic missiles. No one does. The US is closer to having them than anyone else is. Neither Russia nor China have them. No they aren't. The article is untrue. The missiles in question are ballistic not hypersonic. No, you've merely quoted from an inaccurate article.

Very unlikely. Nuclear winter will get most people. Nuclear winter is not mythical. Neither Carl Sagan nor any other scientist has ever stopped believing it.

They will be a very thin layer of meat in a "mountain sandwich" once a B61-11 collapses their bunker.

Some would. Most wouldn't. Civilization would collapse. Whoever said that is wrong. It was certainly close enough. Yes.

You are not qualified to make such assessments about other people. You are not nearly smart enough. It doesn't matter whether the Gulf of Tonkin incident was a lie or not. South Vietnam was still waging a just war of self defense against Communist aggression.

That is incorrect. Japan started WWII in the Pacific. North Vietnam started the Vietnam War. On the contrary, I am a highly informed warmonger. No. The Nazis are all Russians. Ice age swastika =/= Nazis. Modern day Russians = Nazis.

Yes. The innocent civilians would not be the target. They would just be unfortunate collateral damage. But anyway, yes. If it was in response to a nation-killing strike against the US.