Recent content by MKDavis

Untrue. The definition is color-blind.

Sorry, Bubba, but I don't know where you are from. Evidently, you're from a place where English is a Second Language (ESL). In the United States, we use dictionary meanings for words, and evidence to compare with dictionary meanings. Delusional definitions (from complete idiots who eschew...

Through innuendo, half-truths* and outright fabrication, Obama’s opponents deliberately misrepresented a casual family friendship as political indoctrination sessions, or worse. In their rush to malign Obama, their scam transformed the legacy of a relatively obscure leftist poet into a...

" If you think race baiting is not racism then we have nothing more to talk about because for me, it is absolutely racism in one of its ugliest forms." Sorry, but you cannot make up your own creative definitions and expect people of integrity to adopt them. Either "race-baiting" meets the...

Ah, at least we are making some progress. Thanks for the links. Your wiki "rebuttal" contains Wright's race-baiting statements, but EXACTLY which of them meets the definition of "racism"? Which meets the definition of "anti-Semitism"? QUOTE the exact statements, please! I have also...

I'm not sure why this basic concept seems to elude you: The burden of proof is ALWAYS upon the accuser in civilized societies. Asking someone to prove they are not a racist is as ridiculous as asking someone to prove they are not a witch. Misrepresenting a person’s position is a common...

I'm not sure if you are being intentionally dense, but I thought I made it clear that ALL of these listed claims are myths. That's why I listed them: to "call him out" on them. NONE of those claims have been substantiated. FOXFYRE WROTE: "Again, the items on the list have all been in the...

So true! The MSM usually rejects unsubstantiated claims, like those I have been asking Mudwhistle to support, because the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics REJECTS urban myths like these. As is typical in Right-Wing Fantasyland, I encounter bluster, red herrings, and ad...

Unfortunately for your position, the accuser has yet to produce any proof for any of these claims, which relegates them back to "urban legend" status. If there is indeed a "tot of evidence" to support THESE claims, then quoting the most compelling evidence should be easy. However, just...

Disinformation creates urban myths based on "secret knowledge" from anonymous sources. The Internet's viral nature lets myths emerge fully grown from propagandists, or they may perversely grow from a kernel of truth, nurtured by confirmation bias.:eusa_liar:

At least we agree on that. For that reason, I have asked Mudwhistle to PROVE his allegations regarding Obama, who is "presumed innocent until proven guilty." I doubt he can do so, just as ex-D.A. Mike Nifong could not prove the Duke lacrosse players guilty. Even without compelling evidence...

Sorry, buddy, but "you show how they are lies" is not how debate is done. Burden of proof is ALWAYS upon the claimant.

I totally disagree. A factual issue, such as defining an auto or airplane, can be easily done by quoting dictionary.com or other source substantiating one's claim. My point is that all of those specific claims at issue are LIES propagated through fraudulent blogosphere memes. None of them can...

How does asking some to substantiate their points "make the most boring thread possible" or make me "look like a leftwing loony"? This is standard debate protocol. Sorry for the boring part, but I am here to examine the truth. I am not here for your amusement. I am confused by your assertion...

"Mudwhistle is ahead of the debate on substance"? Really? Where is his substance to support his claims? My questions were specific and tied to specific claims, and had nothing to do with "training community organizers to overthrow the government." Saying "the evidence is there" without...