Recent content by Mick2

It was 2016, not 2019, and she fled after Norm Lubow, Jerry Springer's producer, was uncovered as the mastermind behind it.

Obviously nothing is "hidden" if you are aware of it. Think for a minute. Lol Besides, where are you getting that information? I've not seen a reliable source indicating the fbi took any of this seriously. The case was dropped and the accuser fled. Now the question is why should anyone...

I've already posted it. This was widely known and available 10 years ago when Norm Lubow (The Jerry Springer show's producer) was busted for being behind the mastermind behind it (all the while using an alias to throw people off), the case was dropped, and the anonymous accuser suddenly fled...

They were dropped. Whatever he claims after-the-fact matters not.

Except that you can't show what's incorrect about any of it. Lol

The WWIII rhetoric is leftist playback fear-mongering drivel Did Fani Willis stop letting you suck her dick "conservative from georgia Is that why you're so angry, FAGAt?

Says who? OpenAI has similar lines. The difference is they've chosen to work with the administration transparently and in cooperation with the best interests of America. You are flailing here

Systems that fail to safeguard and protect Americans from harm is ethical to you?

That the President and his administration can contract with any company it chooses to work with. You seem confused where no confusion exists.

It's not about "disproving". If I said you were molesting sheep 10 years ago how would YOU disprove it? You don't. The onus of proof is on the accuser. What Snopes facts about this case indicate that it's not a scam? It was peddled by a man who produced the Jerry Springer show and who...

"Katie Johnson" "Seems like it could be true" It was bullshit and tossed 10 years ago because it was being peddled by anti-Trump Jerry Springer show producer who was using an alias to hide his true identity and history of peddling hoaxes: Don't be a damn fool.

You propagandists lost credibility long ago.

"blocking attempts" ....by the minority who got their asses beaten in the last election and lost power to represent constituents because of it? Yeah, no. Election losers don't get to say what "overreach" is. Elections have consequences when voters oppose you. Our reps speak for us.

So you finally admit there cannot be an "executive overreach" of Congress if the majority of our duly-elected reps agree with the action taken? Geez, dummy, you can learn!

Says who?