Recent content by lawfulrevolt

Ha! Perfect. If bloodsucker had 1/2 a brain it would be decrying GATT and NAFTA as well as the infiltrated government and working for an Article V, but noooooooo. OMG! And, if they were such a patriot they would be posting here...

Geeeeeeeee, I wonder why most posters here can only see problems? Looks to me like they are using nonsense to avoid and bury solution. When it is Article V and defining proper methods for soldiers to defend the constitution that is being buried, oooohhh man, this don't look good.

Yup, I can be that kind of extremist, but I prefer being a constitutionalist and focus on solution found in Article V and providing opportunity for soldiers to defend the constitution against domestic enemies constitutionally...

I have to agree, and underline that the infiltration of the government depends on democracy. Worse than idiots, because the nation is a democratically directed representative republic, and the lool-aide drinkers are working for the infiltration if they cannot see that the republic MUST be...

If we unify with soldiers in defense of the constitution, we can replace congress and restore constitutional government. There is a whole lot we can do about it and here is strategy keyed into law for a peaceful revolution...

I'm going to agree with this, but I'm going to remove it from the realm of dogma. Natural law was what they agreed upon, and did so quite well. Natural law can be seen as respect for our instincts, and how socially some structure work, and other don't. The point of the capricious...

Hey, a real thinker. Have you seen these posted around? They are a list of what is called "cognitive distortions" and someone figured out that is what the "cognitive infiltrations" are using. COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS 1. All or nothing thinking: Things are placed in black or white categories...

Hmm, logically, if OWS censors this post at their forum, and they did. http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/207171-how-does-a-soldier-defend-the-constitution-from-a-domestic-enemy.html Then this story, http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-rubber-room/207681-nypd-spys-for-wall-street.html...

Curiously, burning a gold fringed flag, IS defense of the real flag and the constitution. However, such is not as constitutional as legally going after those that think it is okay to fly such flags under color of authority of the constitution.

Such is why lawful and peaceful revolution is needed. Think about this. http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/207171-how-does-a-soldier-defend-the-constitution-from-a-domestic-enemy.html

As I've pointed out, the lack of disintction between flags has led to all kinds of misunderstandings. Some take an over defensive position, but at least they take a position defending what they believe, speaking out, and that is basically belief in the constitution. I clarify here...

This is why we do Article V, a lawful and peaceful revolution. Uncle Kracker - Smile starring Allie Allie - YouTube

I've done a little revision to the second to last paragraph, clarifying what the soldier expects from the military courts. SOLDIERS APPLICATION FOR ORDER OF INQUIRY INTO CONSTITUTIONALITY OF CIVIL AUTHORITY; STATUS ESTABLISHMENT OF LAWFUL MILITARY AUTHORITY. The process is perhaps more in...

Okay. By similar logic, the soldiers inquiry will not create the same problems as did Terence Lakins act. In fact, it is showing the soldier scrupulously folling their oath despite the negative aspects. The oath is similar to an order, but logically, under certain conditions, overides order...

Generally, sadly it seems, that is a very good overall short term strategy that promises some default success. Sadder yet it looks like the DNC is not really any help in doing that because they don't stand directly for the constitution either, or not too often. The long term strategy of...