But the majority opinion ignores our system's fundamental rule to apply legislative intent to the IEEPA.
In a newspaper article published in the Alexandria Gazette, July 2, 1819, Chief Justice Marshall asserted he could “cite from [the common law] the most complete evidence that the intention...
Congress is vested with exclusive legislative power to terminate a President's actions under the IEEPA
Justice Gorsuch writes in his concurring opinion “Whatever else might be said about Congress’s work in IEEPA, it did not clearly surrender to the President the sweeping tariff power he seeks...
The nitwits you refer to are incapable of seeing the obvious. The "plan" is to drastically weaken the terrorist and authoritarian evil government in Iran so the people will have a chance to overthrow that government and establish a government of the people.
Gorsuch, as well as every member on our Supreme Court need to adhere to the text of our Constitution, and its documented legislative intent, which gives context to its text.
JWK
Those who reject abiding by the text of our Constitution, and the intentions and beliefs under which it was agree...
Let me suggest fully informing yourself so as to not post such absurdities. Sometimes silence is golden, at least for those sincerely interested in discovering truth and facts.
Gorsuch defended the “major questions doctrine” (MQD) as a "substantive clear-statement rule"—a constitutional guardrail meant to prevent the Executive from seizing "extraordinary power" without an "unmistakable expression" from Congress.
Contrary to Gorsuch's defense of the MQD the truth is...
While Justice Gorsuch in LEARNING RESOURCES, INC. v. TRUMP entertains much ado about the “major questions doctrine” and its asserted purpose “. . . to sustain a claim that Congress has granted them an extraordinary power, executive officials must identify clear authority for that power . . . “...
:rolleyes:
The majority opinion in LEARNING RESOURCES, INC. v. TRUMP, is based upon a factual error.
Roberts was in total error when alleging “While taxes may accomplish regulatory ends, it does not follow that the power to regulate includes the power to tax as a means of regulation. Indeed...
Our esteemed and learned Chief Justice Roberts may have skipped his early American History classes.
For example, Justice Roberts writes:
"While taxes may accomplish regulatory ends, it does not follow that the power to regulate includes the power to tax as a means of regulation. Indeed, when...
What is troubling about Roberts’ written opinion is, he unwittingly revealed in his written opinion why he intruded upon Congress’s exclusive authority to restrain a president who may have abused the delegation of authority granted by Congress to a president under IEEPA. Justice Roberts writes...
Historical revisionism?
The most fundamental rule of constitutional construction is to adhere to "legislative intent" as opposed to revising the beliefs and intentions under which a provision of the Constitution was agreed to by the States and people therein, and then enforcing that "revisionism".
From Justice Roberts’ opinion:
(a) IEEPA authorizes the President to “investigate, block during the pendency of an investigation, regulate, direct and compel, nullify, void, prevent or prohibit . . . importation or exportation.” §1702(a)(1)(B). Absent from this lengthy list of specific powers...
Surprise! Justice Roberts reveals why he has meddled in Congress’s exclusive and reserved power over IEEPA
Justice Roberts unwittingly revealed in his written opinion why he intruded upon Congress’s exclusive authority to restrain a president who may have abused the delegation of authority...