Recent content by joe77

Where did I say the antithesis of any of that? I'm merely asking why, considering homosexuality, in a big way, precludes reproduction. If you don't desire the kind of sex that would allow one to reproduce, why do you need all the trappings those who would have? It's not just a question of...

I have a question: if being gay is natural, not at all a choice, not at all influenced by environment, people are born that way, nothing can be done to change it...why do gay men still have sperm and semen, and why do lesbians have ovaries and periods? After all, if nature created homosexuals...

Uh, are you sure? I thought the point of NARTH was to prove that homosexuality was treatable, not necessarily a choice for everyone who identifies themselves that way. I didn't see the links you posted, but I will say you're not really proving anything if you posted links from the APA, Royal...

Just jumping in... Of course NARTH has a motive. Every non-profit has some kind of motive, usually to the exclusion of other motives. That's...kind of the point, yeah? Because they receive donations from religious organizations doesn't make them not credible. It just means they receive...