Recent content by Jets

There is a difference between plus-size and obese. Plus size can be Giggity….. ;)

So you do not understand basic English. Got it. ;) No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during...

It says CONGRESSMAN CANNOT BE CIVIL OFFICERS. Do you understand basic English?

Ok, name any member of Congress who has been impeached since William Blount. I‘ll wait…. So you will continue to ignore text that does not support your nonsense. Keep trolling….

Again for the fundamentally challenged: Article II, Section 4: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. Where does it say members of...

Still waiting OP….

Text wins, you lose. Again Blah blah blah….

Members of Congress cannot be Civil Officers. Therefore members of Congress are NOT impeachable REGARDLESS OF what the HoR did with William Blount. Text beats founders intent EVERYTIME. You have lost this argument. Stop wasting my time. 😂😂😂😂😂 And the ostriching continues….

The OP still cannot explain why this is incorrect. 😂😂😂😂😂

You are trolling. That clause explains EXACTLY why members of Congress are not Civil Officers. Only the President, Vice President and Civil Officers can be impeached. FACT. Deflection. You are intentionally ignoring what the words mean. Stop playing obtuse, it’s insulting. Explaining...

I absolutely did. You are being intentionally obtuse. When you explain what it means then we have something to discuss. Until then your paltering is dismissed. Article 1 Section 6 Clause 2 is not only germane to YOUR OP topic , it answers the question why Senator Menandez did not have to be...

So you cannot explain what Article 1 Section 6 Clause 2 means. Got it…. 🤣

Explain Article 1 Section 6 Clause 2. I’ll wait…..

You continue to cherry pick constitutional text when it suits your position, but ignore other text entirely when it opposes your position. You are fooling nobody. Here again the prevarications are astounding. The context of the text in Article 1 Section 6 Clause 2 is self explanatory. The...