Recent content by James Everett

Oh, and get this as well..... In that Texas v White case concerning U.S. Bonds, YOUR SCOTUS stated that Texas never left the union, yet Texas had to meet certain requirements as YOUR Congress stated, before Texas could be "Re-admitted" to the "union". So if as YOUR SCOTUS stated that Texas never...

First, YOUR SCOTUS did NOT rule, they rendered an opinion concerning U.S. Bonds, NOT secession. Second, they did NOT even cite the U.S. CONstitution, or U.S. Law in rendering that opinion concerning those bonds. Third, YOUR SCOTUS is limited in Article III section 2...... "The judicial power...

As for giving you time? Well that law doesn't exist, therefore time to rebut is irrelevant, as you never will be able to cite that law.

Both past and present, as there was no law then, nor has a law ever been passed to present making secession an unlawful or illegal act. Even your current SCOTUS justice Scalia could not cite that law. Some Fred Phelps wannabe stealing Confederate battle ensigns off of Confederate soldiers graves...

Lol, still waiting for you to cite that law, which states that secession is an unlawful or illegal act.

OK, let us begin with YOU posting the Article within the 1787/1789 U.S. CONstitution, amendment thereto, law or statute that states that secession was, or is an unlawful or illegal act. Absent a law making an act unlawful or illegal, then an act cannot be stated to be unlawful or illegal. Most...

Who is "commander"? I see no one using that name.

Oh and one more thing...... Secession was a legal act, hence the Southern people could not have been "Traitors". The Traitors were those in the Northern States who violated the tenth amendment to YOUR U.S. CONstitution.

Oh, your CONstitution legalized Slavery from 1789 until 1865 with the 13th amendment. YOUR Flag flew over Slavery from 1789 until 1865, Your government exterminated the Native American Indian for many years before and after 1865, so stop trying to play the moral superior, as you have no claim.

No, I'm not a "Honkey" or a "Cracker". I doubt you even know the slang definition of either.

Cracka? Childish lil fellow calling out names, such is just as one would expect from an ignorant, who cannot discuss an issue above that which his 8 year old intellect will allow.

I have little doubt that you Fred Phelps ilk would do nothing less, as hatemongers such as you always choose the ground as you high mark.

Childish lil fellow, aren't you?

No its the educated leading the indoctrinated fools from ignorance to knowledge.

I am an educator educating the ignorant, that's why.