Recent content by JackLandsman

Small-penis yucksters, it's edited and everything.

That's, like, a post-graduate thingy, but okay.

The former governor of Alaska is teasing presidential prognosticators for the second consecutive cycle. As it relates to the 2016 election, Sarah Palin is in “serious” consideration. I’m speaking on this from a road less traveled and would like to hear from others: I’m a Palin Democrat. I...

Anti-gay or "homophobic" men that betray nasty right-wing tendencies are always undercover faggots. They're the CIA "deep-staters" who wished Ronald Reagan were secretly queer in 1980 and shot him out impassioned disappointment in '81.

Lincoln was the log cabin Republican. JFK— “Talcum X”—supposedly had Lem Billings in the Lincoln Bedroom, but not really. Instead it was Malcolm X, who admitted to masturbating disgusting white men (like yourself, I imagine) for needed fast cash as a late-teen. For what...

Nice try, closet-case, but your retrograde position doesn't pass the smell test. Nevermind what you personally approve of, allow me a historical point: Abraham Lincoln was gay; so was John F. Kennedy... and Malcolm X. The leadership and relative--to you--heroism of (only) those three individuals...

This thread is destined to be the toast of closet queers with anuses too wide for the man they secretly desire: somebody like Anderson Cooper, for all you ignorant, impotent, closeted and piss-poor sex psychologists. Humanity is going to find it exceedingly difficult to advance--and colonize...

Exactly. Corporate personhood grows from an ideological predisposition. Simply put there is a direct corollary of the 14 Amendment's intended protections from freed slaves and favorable findings for corporations by the Supreme Court in decades since. I'm against it.

My reference to the 14th Amendment, firstly, was absolutely apt and is specifically relevant to your pointing to the latter 19th century as a starting point for this notion of corporate personhood. Corporations, as persons, are granted equal protections under the law, supposedly to guard them...

A nice blog entry that educated me a few years back would be "Corporate Psychopathology" by thirtyplus, a diarist @ DailyKos. It's a nice read.

I know, right. :eusa_eh: You should know, straight man, that it's the crazed closet cases in right-wing quarters that cause the most trouble. It's what explains the vitriol leveled at Sarah Palin in military circles, for example.

A repeal may as well be a metaphysical certainty if Mitt Romney, or Mrs. Palin, were to achieve the White House given the presumed composition of the next Congress; a GOP House and Senate. More to the point, conservatives have already signaled their willingness, and eagerness really, to repeal...

Of course corporations are "made of people". The issue, however, is that in this country corporations as entities are considered persons. This is because of the Supreme Court's historically corporatist reading of the Fourteenth Amendment. It's bunk of course. Hopefully we can do away with...

Barack Obama is gonna come owt of the close too, for all intents and purposes, next year. Stay tuned...

"Liberal moochers"? How dare you. Let me ask: Do Wall Street financiers dependent on the Federal Reserve's quotidian bailout practices qualify as "liberal moochers"? This is too stupid. We're in an era of epic economic inequality. Google "robo judge", come back, and then we can discuss your glib...