Don't think so. If you use a model or estimate you might be able to justify that.
Let's look at unadjusted empirical data:
***sealevel.colorado.edu*** (can't post links yet)
This is from a source the warmists have loved until the data started changing. For those of you who know how to...
You did notice that the red line is an ESTIMATE, yet you offer up that is the most accurate. That's completely laughable that someone would offer up an ESTIMATE as more accurate than observed empirical data.
Well that's ok. If you look at the second graph, there is virtually no sea level...
Do you even look at the links you provide?
The first graph shows sea levels 120,000 years ago equal to what we have now. Those SUVs now have the power to time travel I guess.
The second graph, with the scary red hockey stick is a quadratic fit to tide gauge estimates. It's a freakin'...
****sealevel.colorado.edu/content/new-web-site-new-sea-level-release*** (can't post links yet)
As we are becoming better at measuring global temperatures, it's becoming clear the AGW models are breaking down rather quickly. The new frontier for the warmist crowd is that the oceans will rise...