Recent content by Epitah

Homosexuals do not embody the majority of the human population either. Some animals have been demonstrated to seek homosexual sex simply for pleasure, as many gay and straight couples do in humans, sometimes it doesn't have anything to do with the need for dominance or reproduction. One of...

How is human homosexuality different from animal homosexuality in this case? Animal homosexuality gives no benefit to sexual reproduction of a species as well. If something occurs in nature then it can be classified as natural.

Well yeah, but just because it's contradictory to the biolgoical function of sexuality doesn't make it unnatural. Lots of things in nature are contradictory to eachother, like conditions that are harmful to living creatures. That doesn't make things like the common cold unnatural, does it...

How is that proof of what you're saying? If divine intervention was useful to understanding reality scientists would most certainly be using it. how come a common trend in these arguments is that you just seem constantly paranoid

There are entire textbooks about the Big Bang, I have no idea why you don't research it yourself. I mean, if I do that's not going to change your mind, and if I don't that's not going to change anything aside from you advertising your lack of understand of the concept of "i dont know" I still...

How is that jamming my words down my throat exactly? People who happen to be scientists and physicists speaking out against religion and irrational thought does not equate to a grand scheme against religion just because they feel like it. This is like, lizard people running the white house...

Ahahaha. The theory of evolution is basically irrefutable at this point. We've observed evolution and the amount of evidence for it is phenomenal. We don't don't accept the string theory, it's theoretical. We never said the universe came from nothing, we just don't know. The multiverse theory...

Yes, lots of scientists and rational thinkers happen to disagree, and in some cases dislike religion, but it sounds like a ridiculous idea that scientific propositions are brought up to discredit religion. If divine intervention was just as good of a system as science we would be using it to...

for what insane reason would scientists have to lie about the big bang seems like you just wanted to take an arbitrary shot at global warming for whatever reason so if the universe itself is god what is the point of calling it god? seems like an pointless label Thoughts aren't testable...

you don't even have an argument anymore Do you seriously just think scientists sit behind closed doors and scheme and snicker at how they can try to discredit religion? It's beginning to sound like you actually think that. Do you know how stupid that sounds? If you've got a better system for...

You know a common trend I've noticed online is that when people begin to run out of arguments they begin to attack trivial grammar mistakes as a feeble attempt to discredit the other. Why not come up with an actual, compelling argument for something instead of just ranting about lefties more...

can someone tell him what his evidence is and that he knows the sun is going to rise and that he'll fall off a cliff because of reasonable expectation based on evidence he's kinda dumb that way

You don't need to be a scientist to study and understand scientific theories and models. What does that have to do with this? I don't think you understand this yet. We know the Big Bang happened, we have evidence that leads us to that conclusion. It is the most reliable scientific model of...

I'm no scientist, I've never claimed I was. And no, the Big Bang does not defy explanation, we just don't have a proper one. I still don't think you understand the concept of burden of proof here. You've just stated you're a pantheist and argued over science. That's not showing me the...

if your evidence amounts to a large book by different authors agreeing with eachother, then that's wrong because the bible as a unit holds plenty of contradictions.