Recent content by Clement

They ARE evil. I used to think they were a bunch of lunatics out on the fringe but it's gone way too far for that.

I thought we all understood that earth was exempt from this discussion.

What proof is there of life in the universe.

No, that doesn't follow. Why would a Designer be compelled to spread life all over the universe, and that is not the topic anyway. The topic is why some people are willing to speculate on life on other planets with no proof yet disparage a belief in a Designer again, with no proof.

Have you been following along? It doesn't seem like it. The article of faith I refer to is the notion that any brain fart or idea that can be remotely deemed as "Science" is automatically reality. I don't care how you want to parse it, there is no proof, evidence, fact, extrapolation of fact...

I am immune to yours. All you are doing is making excuses for your own article of faith.

Like you just did.

This is sophistry, you still have no proof, you have dishonestly exchanged one article of faith for another and you're trying to tell me it's different somehow

Somebody would find a way to either execute him or assassinate him - again.

Number one has nothing to do with number two. So what if there are billions of planets? You have no proof of life elsewhere at all, let alone intelligent life.

This clown is all over the internet peddling this crap. My advice would be to not feed the trolls.

Here's an argument: show me the aliens. Where are they? What are they like? You have no proof, only speculation. Period.

The Drake equation is not proof of anything.

Dude, you are a half bubble off plumb and that's for sure and for certain. A fresh "Christianity" not infected with Trinitarianism? You must be a Jehovah's Witness. Trinitarian theology is the only thing that makes Christianity work at all, a man sacrificed on a cross can't save you, only God...

I didn't say a word about what the scientists in the article said, I was talking about what assholes like you say, so was the OP. "Consensus among scientists" is not proof.