In the CONTEXT I framed the statement no I was not wring.
You are not taking the entire post in context.
I was obviously speaking who what humans perceive via their own sensory organs. You can realize that because I used the words perceive and sensory organs.
But you can't understand any...
I have no religious dogma because I have no religion.
And it's not arrogance not to believe something that there is absolutely no reliable proof of.
Tell me did you think Ghostbusters was a documentary?
Where does it say ghosts exist in the Bible? And what reputable scientific study ever proved ghosts exist?
And just because I am not an atheist in no way means I must believe in the god of the bible or any god that people have invented.
Dishonest you are. You ignore the explanation given for that statement and you didn't even quote the entire sentence.
You cherry pick just like you cherry pick the morality out of the bible.
If I quoted you as saying "Men wrote the bible " which you said and then started claiming that means...
Or we just don't see the relationship.
You do like to assume that we mere humans are capable of understanding absolutely everything about everything
And what's funny is you base this assumption on the fact that we understand barely 5% of all the matter and energy in the known universe.
And you are taking that out of context of the discussion it was part of.
I used the example that no 2 people perceive things in the same way.
You don't see the same tree I see. I know that it true because I have a slight degree of vision impairment in my left eye from an injury
So there is...