Recent content by BenNatuf

No, the problem wasw not a lack of regulation, there were plenty of regulations. The problem was malregulation.

Stand up liberal men... get your balls back!!!!

Thats right, liberal men have had enough. they are tired of the feminazi left running thier lives, they are tired of being made effeminate followers and have decided to stand up!!! Toronto News: Students revolt:

That would depend on what you, your wife, and your mistress have agreed to. Not really the point though as it does not involve legal ethics.

I think they will have a long opinion, and iot will consist of mostly non-binding dicta that clearly implies what the court will do if the law is not amended before 2014. I think that's why the court added the question about the anti-injunction act themselves. It is the courts "punting"...

LOL... no dumbass, I'm linking to the actual questions that were granted cert and scheduled for argument.

Is the new liberal meme that a husband should force his wife to stay married to him if she gets sick after SHE asks for a divorce? well, OK then.

drueling too

since he left? about 10 trillion in debt. Your point again was what?

LOL... President Newt... I like that. Gonna be fun watching the libs running around with thier hair on fire over the next year.

odd, thats not what the questions that were granted cert say. let us know when you have actual facts instead of JokeFakey facts.

and here we have the atypical liberal defence to everything neener, neener, neener. You do know what LEGAL ethics are don't you? You do realize that when accusing o judge of a breach of ethics on the subject of recusal it involves LEGAL ethics... right? What you consider "ethical" is...

you would think that dumbassed liberals would learn to stop trusting huffpo for news. Gingrich Said to Be Paid $1.6M by Freddie Mac - Yahoo! Finance also, because you don't know what this is, i figure you may need an example Newt Gingrich to Release Freddie Mac Records, Denies Lobbying -...

I understand them fine, and I know where to go to determine what is and is not considered unethical for a judge... something all of you seem to have forgotten in your rush to judgement (highlighting your own "understanding" of ethics). Which of course would begin with the precept of not judging...