Recent content by BasicGreatGuy

You can say whatever you want about the president and his family, so long as you do not threaten them with physical violence or death. That will get you locked up.

Ron's comment, as well meaning as it may be, shows that he has not read the Espionage Act. As such, he comment is ignorantly incorrect.

Its not about party, at least it shouldn't be. Its about hiring the person whom you believe will best represent the proper adjudication of the Constitution. That is the primary role of employees. Their secondary duty is representing the voice of the people, so long as said voice is congruent...

"Would you break with the establishment and vote 3rd party for freedom if you KNEW voting the same two party system would be the end of the Republic as we know it? ie freedom.." The problem is not the party system (in and of itself). The problem is "We The People" (as a whole), who continue...

Her First Amendment rights were not violated. The First Amendment has never been absolute. The First Amendment restriction applies to the federal government, not the respective states per the Constitution.

As long as a person is not violating the constitutional rights of others, said person should be able to make a much money as he or she desires, regardless of whether or not he or she provides in a manner that meets with your approval.

Disagreeing with your position does not make me or anyone else an idiot. Text does not produce sound. As such, it is impossible for my text based responses to "sound" like anything other than whatever biased projection you give it.

Yes, I do. It is all smoke and mirrors. It is nothing more than code for the hacks in Washington to justify more spending. You are being lied to.

We don't have a surplus. We are in debt over 16 trillion dollars. The size of government continues to grow due to increased spending of monies which we don't have. Not buying the hype you are selling.

Yes, a person has the right to defend him or herself.

Nobody is forced to work at Walmart or anywhere else. Not everyone in this Republic can or will be helped. People die. The best we can do per the Constitution, is leave such needs in the hands of the private sector, or the respective state as the people will entertain. And even then, people...

Should the Republic be governed based on the "end justifies the means" philosophy, or the Constitution of the United States? The federal government is not an insurance company. It is not empowered to make people "whole" against real or perceived societal loss. The role of the federal...

In my opinion, it doesn't matter what the possible market affect minimum wage laws may have, nor the societal makeup of those who rely on said laws. What should matter, is that such laws are not congruent with the enumerated powers of Congress. And as such, should be repealed.

Why is this meaningless and subjective term so important? How about focusing on the individual and what he or she believes per the Constitution, instead of seeking to define some political crusader cape?

In my opinion, there is nothing "heroic" about the subject of the OP.