Recent content by BackAgain

That’s not even remotely analogous. That’s not what I said or suggested. I was talking of people who weren’t even criminals, but worse. I even used modifiers and every thing! True BUT:: Sometimes eliminating the risk is worse than.

Nobody is interested in your ass or opinion. And, as I said, even if it is true, they aren’t the ones most likely to put such a weapon to use. You cannot — at least not with any honesty — say the same of the Iranians.

Again, if any collection of citizens are implicated in some terrorist type conspiracy, it could very well be that it would be a massive mistake to treat them as mere criminals. See, mere criminals get the benefit of a right to Constitutional protections. But I see no evidence that enemy...

Good. Me too. But there are still real world lines and conditions. Crucial state or military secrets often come with the need for KEEPING them secret. That might not be possible if the “people” can summarily review the records concerning those very matters. I believe it’s fair to talk...

Their claim is trivially true. The NPT does not expressly forbid enrichment to 60%. However, that still begs the question: Unless for making nuclear weapons, what other legitimate use would any nation have to enrich it to 60% or more? The only truthful answer is “none.” So what? Them making...

I understand their claims. I simply don’t buy it in the way they hope we might. And with no disrespect intended, I believe you accept their position because it aligns with your beliefs and concerns, but that’s simply not the same as them being right.

I misread your post. My error. I’m curious if anybody ever actually claimed that Ukraine would easily prevail over Putin’s military.

For whatever their word is worth. Nope. What became clear to Trump was that the Iranians had zero intention of negotiating in good faith. Their prior record was also hideous. Indeed, there was simply no valid or logical basis to assume that they were ever going to change that endless deception...

Bullshit.

I shall not be reading any more of your writing.

Hold up. Just before Putin had the Russian military invade Ukraine, many “experts” had predicted as much: Also: ChatGTP also provides links for the above quoted material, in case you need further verification.

No, you asshole. Clearly, you are unfamiliar with the modern age ability to look things up. I had previously posted on this very same topic. Summary: 3 to 5 percent enrichment needed to use uranium to generate power. About 20% for scientific research purposes. Current level of Uranium...

Apparently, you don’t know. You asshole.

Your rhetoric is petty and dishonest. Listen up, fuckstick. Unless you have some unknown ability to explain WHY Iran had chosen to already enrich their Uranium to the 60% level — an explanation which can only have one true reason — then it doesn’t matter that we have feared their nuclear...

A feel good story for reasonable people.