Recent content by AmazonTania

A is known. B is not. You're making a faulty assumption that both categories are increasing, when they are not. If you do not know, do not guess. 55 and older includes individuals who are 65 and older as well, you 'moron.' My statistics makes a clear distinction between the two. It's not my...

Just because you know the variable of one statistic doesn't entail you can guess the other. It's already been established that Part-Time For Noneconomic reasons has decreased for ages 55 and up, and the same thing can be shown for those ages 65 and above. You seen an increase in Part-Time for...

Table 2 only shows part-time for economic reasons. You are, once again, making an assumption based one particular statistic. I don't know why you are so hellbent on creating your own statistics, but that isn't going to work with me.

I don't really see too much which needs addressing. You are saying that the Government is better equipped in understanding what the price for labour should be for each particular job than the market. 1. Wages are determined by the value of your labour, not what the company can afford. 2. The...

The minimum wage has increased over 15 times since the the passage of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Do you really believe firms are just becoming more unethical the more the Government decides to tinker with the minimum wage, or is the Government just distorting market forces? Firms...

I think you're the one having a difficult time understanding. The Geneva Protocol is a treaty prohibiting the use first use of chemical and biological weapons in international armed conflicts. Meaning, should there ever be a war amongst it's signatories, Syria cannot use chemical or biological...

My individual rights supersede your majority rule.

There is a reason why disability has it's on characteristics. You do know this right? Besides, it doesn't show part-time for noneconomic reasons, which is what you are trying to prove is 'increasing.' Focus please.

There is nothing different about Syria...

There is an entrance wage for each company. It's called 'the minimum wage.' It's very nonsensical for employers to take a chance on an inexperienced employee. People generally worked their way up faster before the minimum wage was $7.25/hr. Since the minimum wage is increasing and the minimum...

Okay?

It's not my duty to support your goals, nor is it my obligation.

I don't see what this has to do with wage increases being good for the economy.

Now you're invoking Special Pleading. Special pleading - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Wages are a commodity, which means it's not an issue of demographics. Either a substantial increase in the minimum wage is good for the economy, or it isn't. If it's 'theoretically' good for the US...

Only 20% of CEO compensation is salary based. You should already know this, being a 'One Percenter' and all.