Recent content by 9aces

Well let's start with the fallacies in that post. 1 - That Bush assumed a balanced budget. There were no years prior to 1957 where the budget was in balance. They did get close in one year of the Clinton presidency though. 2 - There were ever any surpluses in the Clinton years. Again, no...

Your argument presupposes the math stays the same. It won't.

Ass is working this cycle.

No, they needed to act. They chose instead not to act, and say they need still more without even trying. Because to try is to risk, and there's one guarantee you can make about a politician, they're not going to risk their gravy train for anything or anyone. Get rid of the ACA by defunding...

I guess Shapiro bought Fields lie. Oh well, his choice to do what he thinks best.

The GOP leadership has been talked to death. The problem is all they ever do is talk, oh and tell us we need to trust them while they do nothing, and if we just vote for enough of them one day they might do something....or not if they think people won't like them. So yes, joining a new party...

You couldn't prove it by your comments thus far. You should try reading it this time, instead of just saying you did and looking stupid.

It'd probably help your case a lot if I wasn't the guy who points to that period, the Silurian, the Eocene, etc. Consistently.

To understand the present you must look to the past. You see many instances of rapid change both positive, and negative, but you do not understand why they happened. So to try and use a micro-fraction of the data to come to a conclusion you've determined is certain is foolish. You cannot...

Well Old Moron, I guess you've missed the posts talking about the discrepancies between current warming trends and previous ones. Oh yes that's right, because they contradict what you say must be the case because someone said so, that someone else said must be an expert. I make the occasional...

Legal. However, when a woman gets an abortion, signs off that she understands that this decision causes the death of a human being, her child. In those exact words, because that's exactly what happens. If she can live with that decision then, so can I.

An analyst doesn't know statistics....that's funny son. An ancestor of mine once said "There's lies, damn lies, and statistics". Like any good analyst, I can take your numbers and make them sound like anything. All I have to do is select what data to use. Which is why I've consistently said...

If you were half as smart as you think you are, I might be worried. Since you're probably about half as smart as I give you credit for being (which ain't much), I'm not. I guess your family's history in the Klan might give you a leg up on how their internal politics worked.

Were they constituents of the Democratic Party then? Might want to look at that history a little closer.

They were bused in, and didn't want to say it.