Recent content by 8537

  1. 8537

    DOJ using Media Matters to attack reporters

    I remember when Tucker Carlson was a legitimate and respected voice for the right.
  2. 8537

    Oversampling of POLITICAL Polls!!!!

    What should the actual breakdown of each poll be?
  3. 8537

    Today, Mitt Romney Lost the Election

    You're not helping me draw you as an ignorant rightwing con:)
  4. 8537

    Even though rw's lie, he was ALIVE

    People challenging the intelligence of others should probably make sure they use proper English.
  5. 8537

    Today, Mitt Romney Lost the Election

    Yes! Just like that.
  6. 8537

    Today, Mitt Romney Lost the Election

    Notice how he's only willing to do it when he thinks no one is watching? That should tell you something.
  7. 8537

    Today, Mitt Romney Lost the Election

    The whole Mother Jones expose (along with the note that they have far more video) is a great read. Holy shit... SECRET VIDEO: Romney Tells Millionaire Donors What He REALLY Thinks of Obama Voters | Mother Jones
  8. 8537

    Surprise! Oversampling Dems Puts Obama in Lead

    The most recent polls aren't registered voters. They are almost exclusively Likely Voters.
  9. 8537

    Surprise! Oversampling Dems Puts Obama in Lead

    They all use the same method for most purposes. Namely, they poll a whole bunch of people and ask - and that's why all of the samplings from Fox to Gallup to PPP return breakdowns within each other's margin of error.
  10. 8537

    Why do "conservatives" support individuals being able to take/use YOUR land?

    I happen to believe there are legitimate uses of eminent domain for proper government functions - to build a runway for an AF base, for example, or locate a radar installation. Reasonable people may disagree on that use. However, this case is very different. In this case the government is...
  11. 8537

    Surprise! Oversampling Dems Puts Obama in Lead

    Your "confident they have methods" because...well...that just "feels" right or what? I agree - they have methods. Namely, they do a poll of a few thousand randomly-sampled people asking party affiliation.
  12. 8537

    Why do "conservatives" support individuals being able to take/use YOUR land?

    They have to transfer money to the person losing the property. "purchase" usually implies an agreed-upon price. This isn't a price reached in mutual agreement.
  13. 8537

    Surprise! Oversampling Dems Puts Obama in Lead

    So you claim there are "plenty of methods" but you can't actually explain what they might be? How do you know they over-sampled Democrats?
  14. 8537

    Why do "conservatives" support individuals being able to take/use YOUR land?

    How does shipping tar sands from Canada to Houston in order to refine and ship it overseas "benefit us all" And of COURSE it would only be used when people refuse to sell. That's the whole point. The private company first comes with a nice letter. If that fails to persuade you they come with...
  15. 8537

    Surprise! Oversampling Dems Puts Obama in Lead

    Eh....OK then. So what do you believe an accurate breakdown would be, and how did you arrive at that conclusion?
Back
Top Bottom