0311's latest activity

  • 0
    0311 reacted to Fort Fun Indiana's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    Also known as a large tax increase.
  • 0
    0311 reacted to ElmerMudd's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Thanks Thanks.
    You don't understand our democratic republic. Basically, there is no you and and no me; it is us. The seperation of powers and the basic...
  • 0
    0311 reacted to Arresmillao's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    trump lost like a dog, anything he attempts will go to the courts, and in just 9 months there will be a congress led by democrats which...
  • 0
    0311 reacted to ElmerMudd's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    You cannot be serious. The supreme court interprets and enforces the constitution. That is what they did today.
  • 0
    0311 replied to the thread Tariff ruling..
    Now 33-Pages of ReNaziKlans twisting, turning, whirling like dervishes to try to defend 47 and his failed tariffs. Face it, he had his...
  • 0
    0311 reacted to Care4all's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    The one on one tariffs that had a specific purpose, like with China that were done properly, as congress previously dictated through...
  • 0
    0311 reacted to YoursTruly's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
  • 0
    0311 reacted to JimH52's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    Did you listen to his lie filled press conference about the USSC decision? I tried, but got about two minutes into it and became...
  • 0
    0311 reacted to YoursTruly's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
  • 0
    0311 reacted to YoursTruly's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Thanks Thanks.
    You're both right.
  • 0
    0311 reacted to schmidlap's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Thanks Thanks.
    Given that constitutional scholars have long anticipated that conservative justices would uphold the separation of powers, one would...
  • 0
    0311 reacted to WorldWatcher's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    Follow on legislation in the 1930's, 1960's, and 1970's basically rendered Smoot-Hawley moot. WW
  • 0
    0311 reacted to YoursTruly's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    Small Business Owners Celebrate Supreme Court Striking Down Trump's Tariffs The battle against the president's so-called reciprocal...
  • 0
    0311 reacted to Luckyone's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    Live updates: Trump vows new tariffs after 'deeply disappointing' Supreme Court decision The Supreme Court's decision does not affect...
  • 0
    0311 reacted to YoursTruly's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    SC ruled Trump was breaking the law. I agree. So what does he do? Continues to break the law. He's trying to get himself impeached...
  • 0
    0311 reacted to skews13's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Thanks Thanks.
    Wait until November.
  • 0
    0311 replied to the thread Tariff ruling..
    As MAGA MAGGOTS twist themselves into pretzels to defend Dementia Don, try to remember this. Article I. Section VIII. Clause I...
  • 0
    0311 reacted to WorldWatcher's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    Smoot-Hawley Act passed in 1930 didn't cause the market crash of 1929, but it depended and prolonged the Great Depression for years with...
  • 0
    0311 reacted to WorldWatcher's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Thanks Thanks.
    Yes. If Congress passed such legislation, it would be legal. Good luck. WW
  • 0
    0311 reacted to Care4all's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Thanks Thanks.
    Their decision was good for upholding the Constitution and good for we the people. Trump can still raise tariffs, but he simply needs...
  • 0
    0311 reacted to Clipper's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    Is that why your boy stood up in front of the entire country today whining like a little *****?
  • 0
    0311 reacted to WorldWatcher's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    Because Article I places the responsibility for import duties (i.e. import taxes or tariffs) with Congress. WW
  • 0
    0311 reacted to Fort Fun Indiana's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    For what Trumpers are calling "not even a setback", Trump sure is whining a lot about it.
  • 0
    0311 reacted to Blaster's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Funny Funny.
    That just proves SCOTUS is not a Conservative majority.
  • 0
    0311 reacted to d0gbreath's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    It was 6-3 dude.
  • 0
    0311 reacted to citygator's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    No one wins by losing more than Trump.
  • 0
    0311 reacted to Clipper's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Fact Fact.
    You call the two-bit hustler & conman from Queens having his ass handed back to him by SCOTUS, winning? If your boy is winning then...
  • 0
    0311 replied to the thread Tariff ruling..
    The 6 - 3 reaffirms that the Legislative Branch, NOT the Executive Branch controls the purse.
  • 0
    0311 reacted to Frankeneinstein's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Funny Funny.
    What good was the decision then?... and In what "other ways"? and what if the people wanted the tariffs? would the decision then be...
  • 0
    0311 reacted to candycorn's post in the thread Tariff ruling. with Thanks Thanks.
    Well, the point was that something that was man-made (so to speak) was intevening in the market economy. If the plant that makes...
Show older items
Back
Top Bottom