Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They best place to start is actually 1187; Saladin, and Richard the Lionhearted.............many, many Muslims know the history............................
They best place to start is actually 1187; Saladin, and Richard the Lionhearted.............many, many Muslims know the history............................
The best place to start is with Mo's slaughters and looting, and the spread of that into Europe, and being repulsed. The Crusades were a response to Islamic invasions and violence, and merely an attempt to recover lost provinces.
Many many Muslims are full of crap, and nobody cares what historical fantasy they like to peddle.
They best place to start is actually 1187; Saladin, and Richard the Lionhearted.............many, many Muslims know the history............................
The best place to start is with Mo's slaughters and looting, and the spread of that into Europe, and being repulsed. The Crusades were a response to Islamic invasions and violence, and merely an attempt to recover lost provinces.
Many many Muslims are full of crap, and nobody cares what historical fantasy they like to peddle.
Not a fantasy; Richard the Lionhearted slaughtered thousands of men women and children when Saladin could not pay a ransom; on the other Saladin let many of his prisoners go.............women, children, the elderly......that is why the term "crusade", associated with invasion of Iraq, ignited a fire in the Muslim world.
Read up on the subject; I already learned from the scholars.
Saladin's brother encouraged him in sparing the 'innocent'. Did SOME early Muslim groups participate in slaughter? Yes, primarily of those who are not "people of the book". Chriatians and Jews ARE.
Getting to know foreign cultures may be very interesting and serve a purpose as long as there is some chance for peaceful relations, but in the case of radical Islam, which has no tolerance for pluralism, we have no alternative but to annihilate them. Because if we do not they will annihilate us.
It seems incredible, but at the height of Arabic society, they were extremely tolerant towards people of other religions and ethic origins. This philosophy of absolute intolerance does not correlate with Arab society historically.
It seems that when Arab society was the most tolerant, they were the most successful, but the less tolerant they are the less successful they are as a society.
Getting to know foreign cultures may be very interesting and serve a purpose as long as there is some chance for peaceful relations, but in the case of radical Islam, which has no tolerance for pluralism, we have no alternative but to annihilate them. Because if we do not they will annihilate us.
It seems incredible, but at the height of Arabic society, they were extremely tolerant towards people of other religions and ethic origins. This philosophy of absolute intolerance does not correlate with Arab society historically.
It seems that when Arab society was the most tolerant, they were the most successful, but the less tolerant they are the less successful they are as a society.
There have been large periods of history wherein Muslims were persecuted. They learned from the Masters, those who first persecuted them. ISIS like many radical off shoots, is a product of what Muslim cultures FEAR, Western invasion, subjugation, and theft. Invading Iraq gave radical Islam food for the next several centuries.
It seems incredible, but at the height of Arabic society, they were extremely tolerant towards people of other religions and ethic origins. This philosophy of absolute intolerance does not correlate with Arab society historically.
It seems that when Arab society was the most tolerant, they were the most successful, but the less tolerant they are the less successful they are as a society.
There have been large periods of history wherein Muslims were persecuted. They learned from the Masters, those who first persecuted them.
ISIS like many radical off shoots, is a product of what Muslim cultures FEAR, Western invasion, subjugation, and theft. Invading Iraq gave radical Islam food for the next several centuries.
Getting to know foreign cultures may be very interesting and serve a purpose as long as there is some chance for peaceful relations, but in the case of radical Islam, which has no tolerance for pluralism, we have no alternative but to annihilate them. Because if we do not they will annihilate us.
It seems incredible, but at the height of Arabic society, they were extremely tolerant towards people of other religions and ethic origins. This philosophy of absolute intolerance does not correlate with Arab society historically.
It seems that when Arab society was the most tolerant, they were the most successful, but the less tolerant they are the less successful they are as a society.