Womyn’s March Run by a Man

Contumacious

Radical Freedom
Aug 16, 2009
19,744
2,473
280
Adjuntas, PR , USA
gettyimages-151703283_0.jpg


Ex-WSJ Reporter Finds George Soros Has Ties To More Than 50 "Partners" Of The Women’s March


.

 
"In the pre-dawn darkness of today’s presidential inauguration day, I faced a choice, as a lifelong liberal feminist who voted for Donald Trump for president: lace up my pink Nike sneakers to step forward and take the DC Metro into the nation’s capital for the inauguration of America’s new president, or wait and go tomorrow to the after-party, dubbed the “Women’s March on Washington”?

The Guardian has touted the “Women’s March on Washington” as a “spontaneous” action for women’s rights. Another liberal media outlet, Vox, talks about the “huge, spontaneous groundswell” behind the march. On its website, organizers of the march are promoting their work as “a grassroots effort” with “independent” organizers. Even my local yoga studio, Beloved Yoga, is renting a bus and offering seats for $35. The march’s manifesto says magnificently, “The Rise of the Woman = The Rise of the Nation.”

It’s an idea that I, a liberal feminist, would embrace. But I know — and most of America knows — that the organizers of the march haven’t put into their manifesto: the march really isn’t a “women’s march.” It’s a march for women who are anti-Trump.

As someone who voted for Trump, I don’t feel welcome, nor do many other women who reject the liberal identity-politics that is the core underpinnings of the march, so far, making white women feel unwelcome, nixing women who oppose abortion and hijacking the agenda.

To understand the march better, I stayed up through the nights this week, studying the funding, politics and talking points of the some 403 groups that are “partners” of the march. Is this a non-partisan “Women’s March”?"

.
 
Soros shot himself in the foot when his ego announced to the world what his intentions really are. He showed his cards and we called him on it. And so is the rest of the world.
His crowning achievement was to take the United States down. He said so. And he paid Hitlery extremely well to be on board. And we just told him that he was going to fail. Now he realizes he'll be dead before our President is through with him and his goal of ruling the world. Bravo America.
 
Last edited:
Soros shot himself in the foot when his ego announced to the world what his intentions really are. He showed his cards and we called him on it. And so is the rest of the world.
His crowning achievement was to take the United States down. He said so. And he paid Hitlery extremely well to be on board. And we just told him that he was going to fail. Now he realizes he'll be dead before our President is through with him. Bravo America.


By my draft research, which I’m opening up for crowd-sourcing on GoogleDocs, Soros has funded, or has close relationships with, at least 56 of the march’s “partners,” including “key partners” Planned Parenthood, which opposes Trump’s anti-abortion policy, and the National Resource Defense Council, which opposes Trump’s environmental policies. The other Soros ties with “Women’s March” organizations include the partisan MoveOn.org (which was fiercely pro-Clinton), the National Action Network (which has a former executive director lauded by Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett as “a leader of tomorrow” as a march co-chair and another official as “the head of logistics”). Other Soros grantees who are “partners” in the march are the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. March organizers and the organizations identified here haven’t yet returned queries for comment
 
Much like post-election protests, which included a sign, “Kill Trump,” were not “spontaneous,” as reported by some media outlets, the “Women’s March” is an extension of strategic identity politics that has so fractured America today, from campuses to communities. On the left or the right, it’s wrong. But, with the inauguration, we know the politics. With the march, “women” have been appropriated for a clearly anti-Trump day. When I shared my thoughts with her, my yoga studio owner said it was “sad” the march’s organizers masked their politics. “I want love for everyone,” she said.
 
I wonder how many of them would take a man walking around with balls and a penis sticking out of his head seriously? Well, vaginaheads, same thing. If you had a statement to make it was certainly overshadowed by your fashion statement. How much closer are we to equal pay now that you have had your say?

On the other hand Trump just made a women head of the Air Force, because she qualified for the position with Air Force headgear. See the difference?
 

Forum List

Back
Top