Missourian
Diamond Member
1. it wouldn't be "listed".
2. there doesn't have to be a "ban" for a judge to order someone to "put away the cell phone".
aren't you listening?
I can't believe I am responding to you.... but did you even read the article...of course not or you would've seen the following...
Please stop making a fool of yourself...
Jackson reported there were no notices or warnings posted, a statement contradicted by the clerk's office spokeswoman, who told WND that visitors to court were told of the judge's ban on text messages. However, when asked how the warning was delivered, by sign or verbal statement, she said, "I have no idea."
again, IDIOT... the judge only had to give a verbal warning.
do me a favor and please argue about these with someone who DOESN'T spend all day in court.
In the article, the court clerk is asked about a verbal warning and said she had "no idea". I would imagine that a court clerk who had sat through that verbal warning time and again would remember it.