Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Dude...You really should quit posting links to the #1 site directly connected to the guys who've been caught red handed fudging the data.Why does it take so long for something like this to hit USMB. Are we in a time warp?
RealClimate: With all due respect
Just checking the date, 6 December 2009. Ooookay, so what happened?
I love the ad - "Name here"
Should have been, "Me too!"
There are many independent studies that say the polar caps are melting and the oceans are rising. The e-mails do not show massive fraud.
Yes. Really.Dude...You really should quit posting links to the #1 site directly connected to the guys who've been caught red handed fudging the data.Why does it take so long for something like this to hit USMB. Are we in a time warp?
RealClimate: With all due respect…
Just checking the date, 6 December 2009. Ooookay, so what happened?
I love the ad - "Name here"
Should have been, "Me too!"
have they? Really?...
There are independent studies showing the Mars polar ice caps are retreating, also. Go figure.....There are many independent studies that say the polar caps are melting and the oceans are rising. The e-mails do not show massive fraud.
"Few challenges facing America and the world are more urgent than combating climate change.The science is beyond dispute and the facts are clear."
Why does it take so long for something like this to hit USMB. Are we in a time warp?
RealClimate: With all due respect
Just checking the date, 6 December 2009. Ooookay, so what happened?
I love the ad - "Name here"
Should have been, "Me too!"
In the e-mail messages, Phil Jones, director of the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit in England, discussed removing papers from the unit's research that raise questions about global warming and the environmental consequences he and other researchers predict.
"I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report," Jones writes. "Kevin and I will keep them out somehow -- even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"
In another, Jones talked about completing a "trick" to "hide the decline" in recent temperature data.
In a statement issued Tuesday, Jones said he is stepping down so that the research can continue without the controversy about his statements.
Climate-change researcher resigns after disclosure of e-mail messages | Louisiana Politics & Government - - Louisiana Politics | State Legislature News - NOLA.com
You steem grasses!
They won't. They'll just ignore it and hope it doesn't get too much play.Gee...Four reviewers of the IPCC in there.
I wonder how the AGW cargo cultists will spin that one?
Dude...You really should quit posting links to the #1 site directly connected to the guys who've been caught red handed fudging the data.Why does it take so long for something like this to hit USMB. Are we in a time warp?
RealClimate: With all due respect…
Just checking the date, 6 December 2009. Ooookay, so what happened?
I love the ad - "Name here"
Should have been, "Me too!"
Why does it take so long for something like this to hit USMB. Are we in a time warp?
RealClimate: With all due respect…
Just checking the date, 6 December 2009. Ooookay, so what happened?
I love the ad - "Name here"
Should have been, "Me too!"
This came out long before the leaked climate change emails. It'll be interesting to see how the emails will change the debate at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen Dec. 7-18. The main issue, of course, is that Climate Change research is being subverted by a few unscrupulous scientists who are ostensibly in it for the money, and the politicians who stand to gain politically and financially from falsified data. Stories like this just make me angry:
In the e-mail messages, Phil Jones, director of the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit in England, discussed removing papers from the unit's research that raise questions about global warming and the environmental consequences he and other researchers predict.
"I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report," Jones writes. "Kevin and I will keep them out somehow -- even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"
In another, Jones talked about completing a "trick" to "hide the decline" in recent temperature data.
In a statement issued Tuesday, Jones said he is stepping down so that the research can continue without the controversy about his statements.
Climate-change researcher resigns after disclosure of e-mail messages | Louisiana Politics & Government - - Louisiana Politics | State Legislature News - NOLA.com
The scientists discredited themselves. They needed no help at all, other than the leaker of their emails.campaign to discredit the science.
"Few challenges facing America and the world are more urgent than combating climate change.The science is beyond dispute and the facts are clear."
PRESIDENT-ELECT BARACK OBAMA, NOVEMBER 19 , 2008
Why does it take so long for something like this to hit USMB. Are we in a time warp?
RealClimate: With all due respect…
Just checking the date, 6 December 2009. Ooookay, so what happened?
I love the ad - "Name here"
Should have been, "Me too!"
This came out long before the leaked climate change emails. It'll be interesting to see how the emails will change the debate at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen Dec. 7-18. The main issue, of course, is that Climate Change research is being subverted by a few unscrupulous scientists who are ostensibly in it for the money, and the politicians who stand to gain politically and financially from falsified data. Stories like this just make me angry:
In the e-mail messages, Phil Jones, director of the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit in England, discussed removing papers from the unit's research that raise questions about global warming and the environmental consequences he and other researchers predict.
"I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report," Jones writes. "Kevin and I will keep them out somehow -- even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"
In another, Jones talked about completing a "trick" to "hide the decline" in recent temperature data.
In a statement issued Tuesday, Jones said he is stepping down so that the research can continue without the controversy about his statements.
Climate-change researcher resigns after disclosure of e-mail messages | Louisiana Politics & Government - - Louisiana Politics | State Legislature News - NOLA.com
I'm going to be very happy when the inquiry hands down its findings, I don't much care which way it goes, but it will be good to get some clarity here. And by all means lets discuss vested interests and have a good look behind the hack and the campaign to discredit the science.
"Few challenges facing America and the world are more urgent than combating climate change.The science is beyond dispute and the facts are clear."
PRESIDENT-ELECT BARACK OBAMA, NOVEMBER 19 , 2008
A President acting upon information which he believed to be "clear" and "beyond dispute", only to be disproven.
Feels like deja vu.
"Few challenges facing America and the world are more urgent than combating climate change.The science is beyond dispute and the facts are clear."
PRESIDENT-ELECT BARACK OBAMA, NOVEMBER 19 , 2008
A President acting upon information which he believed to be "clear" and "beyond dispute", only to be disproven.
Feels like deja vu.
Yep. Americans really know how to pick idiots to be their leaders. I doubt most will wake up in time.
Were some of the folks who digitally signed that email CATO sent out really not scientists?
Were some of the folks who digitally signed that email CATO sent out really not scientists?
