What happens to the prestige of the caucus, if they give the nod to someone who can't possibly win? Will that rejection lead to third party run and a guaranteed win for Obama?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wouldn't worry your little head to much.
Paul has a fair chance of winning the whole thing.
Newts almost done, Romney has always been the also ran guy that no one can really really support, so all Paul has to do is keep on keeping on and just ride it to the end.
Suck it republicans, you are going to have to route for an actual conservative or live with big 0 in the big WH for another 4 years.
I wouldn't worry your little head to much.
Paul has a fair chance of winning the whole thing.
Newts almost done, Romney has always been the also ran guy that no one can really really support, so all Paul has to do is keep on keeping on and just ride it to the end.
Suck it republicans, you are going to have to route for an actual conservative or live with big 0 in the big WH for another 4 years.
Ron Paul winning Iowa would be the equivlent of Pat Buchanan winning New Hampshire in 1996. It'll panick the establishment into getting behind someone- anyone- who can beat him. Even if that person is a sure-fire loser in the General.
I am really surprised the Democrats aren't getting behind Paul in Iowa and NH, since their guy is running unopposed. That would be a way of really screwing with things.
I wouldn't worry your little head to much.
Paul has a fair chance of winning the whole thing.
Newts almost done, Romney has always been the also ran guy that no one can really really support, so all Paul has to do is keep on keeping on and just ride it to the end.
Suck it republicans, you are going to have to route for an actual conservative or live with big 0 in the big WH for another 4 years.
Ron Paul winning Iowa would be the equivlent of Pat Buchanan winning New Hampshire in 1996. It'll panick the establishment into getting behind someone- anyone- who can beat him. Even if that person is a sure-fire loser in the General.
I am really surprised the Democrats aren't getting behind Paul in Iowa and NH, since their guy is running unopposed. That would be a way of really screwing with things.
They want robot romney side by side with the very charismatic big 0.
Romney will be crushed in any and every debate. Paul and Newt could crush him.
why is it you think we have yet to hear anything bad about robot from the media?
What happens to the prestige of the caucus, if they give the nod to someone who can't possibly win? Will that rejection lead to third party run and a guaranteed win for Obama?
Iowa is seldom a good weather vane as to who is going to get the nomination which is why Romney doesn't really care if he gets it or not. Iowans don't like negative ads and Romney has been pumping those into Iowa like nobody's business. He's concentrating on beating down Newt, not winning the caucus. Why? Because it doesn't matter all that much.
What happens to the prestige of the caucus, if they give the nod to someone who can't possibly win? Will that rejection lead to third party run and a guaranteed win for Obama?
Iowa is seldom a good weather vane as to who is going to get the nomination which is why Romney doesn't really care if he gets it or not. Iowans don't like negative ads and Romney has been pumping those into Iowa like nobody's business. He's concentrating on beating down Newt, not winning the caucus. Why? Because it doesn't matter all that much.
Oh, I don't know, Iowa has picked the eventual winner more times than not.
Mittens runs hot and cold in Iowa. A win by him there would probably seal it for him, a win by Newt would make it competitive, a win by Paul would invalidate it because Paul is done after Iowa. He's out of money then.
They are all pretty awful candidates for various reasons, you have to wonder why the GOP is not putting its best foot forward against a president who is pretty beatable.
You have to wonder what they know that we don't. That something awful is on the horizen and they don't want to be holding the bag when it hits.
It's funny to me to hear the talking heads on TV say something and then to come on this board and see a bunch of people repeating it. If Ron Paul had the support of the media you all would be lining up for bumper stickers.
I wouldn't worry your little head to much.
Paul has a fair chance of winning the whole thing.
Newts almost done, Romney has always been the also ran guy that no one can really really support, so all Paul has to do is keep on keeping on and just ride it to the end.
Suck it republicans, you are going to have to route for an actual conservative or live with big 0 in the big WH for another 4 years.
Ron Paul winning Iowa would be the equivlent of Pat Buchanan winning New Hampshire in 1996. It'll panick the establishment into getting behind someone- anyone- who can beat him. Even if that person is a sure-fire loser in the General.
I am really surprised the Democrats aren't getting behind Paul in Iowa and NH, since their guy is running unopposed. That would be a way of really screwing with things.
Iowa is seldom a good weather vane as to who is going to get the nomination which is why Romney doesn't really care if he gets it or not. Iowans don't like negative ads and Romney has been pumping those into Iowa like nobody's business. He's concentrating on beating down Newt, not winning the caucus. Why? Because it doesn't matter all that much.
What happens to the prestige of the caucus, if they give the nod to someone who can't possibly win? Will that rejection lead to third party run and a guaranteed win for Obama?
Wouldn't be the first time - for either party - that the Iowa winner didn't become the presidential nominee.
It's funny to me to hear the talking heads on TV say something and then to come on this board and see a bunch of people repeating it. If Ron Paul had the support of the media you all would be lining up for bumper stickers.