Will Bush also be blamed for this?

Heck, Bush's fault is Bush's fault.

I hate reruns and this blame bush theme has run it's course.

Think so huh? LOL! We still have miles of blame Bush to go. How about survivor benefits for 911 victims? Hmmm?:cool:

When obama can get something going with the economy then we can talk.

oh and by the way all Government employees be it county city state or federal have benifits. So what benifits are you talking about?
 
Loser award goes to

Rinata!!!!!!!! let's have a nice round :clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2: for Rinata:cuckoo:

I am pleased to accept!! The day you and your cronies like any post of mine, I'll know it's time for me to re-evaluate my political beliefs. Thanks for making my day, oh stupid one. :)
If I could, I'd give you some neg rep and put your theory to the test. :lol:

I would but neging someone because I do not agree with their views is not right. I neg to strike back when I get neg'ed or they are just plain stupid.

Now for those that might read this reply and I have neged you, evaluate your views as to why I neged you.
You are either stupid
or you neged me.
 
Now back to the original intent of this thread

BAGHDAD (AP) - Four prisoners with links to al-Qaida who were guarded by U.S. troops escaped from a maximum-security prison in Baghdad, U.S. and Iraqi officials said Thursday.

The breakout from Karkh Prison, formerly called Camp Cropper, is an embarrassment for the U.S. military, which has handed over to the Iraqi government control of all of the detention centers it used to run. But at the request of the Iraqis, the U.S. has retained custody over some of the most dangerous prisoners, including those with ties to terrorist groups or Saddam Hussein's former regime.

U.S. troops found two detainees attempting to escape from the compound Wednesday evening, the military said in a statement. They checked the entire prison and discovered that four other detainees were missing.

"U.S. Forces-Iraq, Iraqi Security Forces and the MoJ (Ministry of Justice) are working to apprehend these individuals," said Maj. Gen. Jerry Cannon, the head of U.S. detainee operations in Iraq. "This event is under investigation."

Read more from this Tulsa World article at Four in al-Qaida escape Iraqi prison | Tulsa World
 
Unbelievably I think John Stewart said it best. When he asked what the Democrats message was, and was told "Republicans drove the country into the ditch and now they want the keys back" and he replied. "You're in trouble dude!"

The Blame game is not working anymore, But do please keep using it. It is the Best message the Republicans have right now, since they can not seem to get one of their own.

Sad state of affairs we have today.
 
Of course Pres. Bush will be blamed, liberals will not take responsiblity for their actions.

Yeah, we learned that trick from the cons.

I guess that would make you self taught.

Oh, no, I said we learned that trick from the cons. Cons like you. Cons that said we were unAmerican for not supporting the WMD lies, that you now try to say we supported. Those kinds of lies, con. Your failure to accept responsibility for your own fucking messes, and pull yourself up by the gater-belt like the fem-man you are. You rack up a trillion dollar war bill and then try to blame libs who were lied to by Bush, for voting for your fucked up me wars. That kind of responsibility con.
 
Yeah, we learned that trick from the cons.

I guess that would make you self taught.

Oh, no, I said we learned that trick from the cons. Cons like you. Cons that said we were unAmerican for not supporting the WMD lies, that you now try to say we supported. Those kinds of lies, con. Your failure to accept responsibility for your own fucking messes, and pull yourself up by the gater-belt like the fem-man you are. You rack up a trillion dollar war bill and then try to blame libs who were lied to by Bush, for voting for your fucked up me wars. That kind of responsibility con.

Once again for those with the short memory spans...

What Democrats said about Weapons of Mass Destruction

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
 
I guess that would make you self taught.

Oh, no, I said we learned that trick from the cons. Cons like you. Cons that said we were unAmerican for not supporting the WMD lies, that you now try to say we supported. Those kinds of lies, con. Your failure to accept responsibility for your own fucking messes, and pull yourself up by the gater-belt like the fem-man you are. You rack up a trillion dollar war bill and then try to blame libs who were lied to by Bush, for voting for your fucked up me wars. That kind of responsibility con.

Once again for those with the short memory spans...

What Democrats said about Weapons of Mass Destruction

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

Have IU reped you today?
 
Yeah, we learned that trick from the cons.

I guess that would make you self taught.

Oh, no, I said we learned that trick from the cons. Cons like you. Cons that said we were unAmerican for not supporting the WMD lies, that you now try to say we supported. Those kinds of lies, con. Your failure to accept responsibility for your own fucking messes, and pull yourself up by the gater-belt like the fem-man you are. You rack up a trillion dollar war bill and then try to blame libs who were lied to by Bush, for voting for your fucked up me wars. That kind of responsibility con.

Last time I check according to the democrats the Republicans are the party of NO so how could you learn anything from the party of NO? Which would make you self taught.
 
For almost two years as President obama has blamed Bush for every thing. I wonder if he will blame him for this also, or will it even get air time in the news?

Four in al-Qaida escape Iraqi prison

Read more from this Tulsa World article at Four in al-Qaida escape Iraqi prison | Tulsa World

Saddam did not like al-Qaida, they represented another power base. So, had we not invaded Iraq needlessly on the basis of lies, there would be no al-Qaida in an Iraqi prison, Saddam would have had them killed immediatly on capture.

As far as the intent of your thread, yes, most of what has gone wrong in Iraq is Bush's fault. And invasion of another country on the basis of lies. A totally incompetant occupation of that nation. Policies in and toward that nation that were designed much more for the enrichment of corperations such as Haliburton than the advancement of the interests of the United States.

As for the rest, Iraqi prisons are now Iraq's problem. We are pulling out, and, supposedly, have handed over the running of that nation to Iraqis.
 
For almost two years as President obama has blamed Bush for every thing. I wonder if he will blame him for this also, or will it even get air time in the news?

Four in al-Qaida escape Iraqi prison

Read more from this Tulsa World article at Four in al-Qaida escape Iraqi prison | Tulsa World

Saddam did not like al-Qaida, they represented another power base. So, had we not invaded Iraq needlessly on the basis of lies, there would be no al-Qaida in an Iraqi prison, Saddam would have had them killed immediatly on capture.

As far as the intent of your thread, yes, most of what has gone wrong in Iraq is Bush's fault. And invasion of another country on the basis of lies. A totally incompetant occupation of that nation. Policies in and toward that nation that were designed much more for the enrichment of corperations such as Haliburton than the advancement of the interests of the United States.

As for the rest, Iraqi prisons are now Iraq's problem. We are pulling out, and, supposedly, have handed over the running of that nation to Iraqis.

Saddam did not like al-Qaida, they represented another power base.

Do you really believe that? I guess you never heard of the Arabic saying the enemy of my enemy is my friend. I do not care what you say if you ain't Muslim you ain't shit. Muslims stick together even though they fight one another they will defend their religion against any outsider. So don't be stupid anymore you have just had a valuable lesson. learn it and live it. class dismissed.
 
For almost two years as President obama has blamed Bush for every thing. I wonder if he will blame him for this also, or will it even get air time in the news?

Four in al-Qaida escape Iraqi prison

Read more from this Tulsa World article at Four in al-Qaida escape Iraqi prison | Tulsa World

Bush and team get the blame they deserve.

They have only been blamed for the shit they did, YES that is alot of shit because they fucked alot ot things up.

Whining about having to take deserved blame is a big part of the right wing agenda.

I just wish you people would come up with a decent idea once in awhile instead of pissing your pants every time you have to accept the blame for fucking stupid failed ideas.
 
For almost two years as President obama has blamed Bush for every thing. I wonder if he will blame him for this also, or will it even get air time in the news?

Four in al-Qaida escape Iraqi prison

Read more from this Tulsa World article at Four in al-Qaida escape Iraqi prison | Tulsa World

Bush and team get the blame they deserve.

They have only been blamed for the shit they did, YES that is alot of shit because they fucked alot ot things up.

Whining about having to take deserved blame is a big part of the right wing agenda.

I just wish you people would come up with a decent idea once in awhile instead of pissing your pants every time you have to accept the blame for fucking stupid failed ideas.

Again tell me who was in control of congress when the economy dropped like a hot potato?
 

Why do I have to click on a link to the huffington post to go to another link that leads me to the Washington Independent to get a poll that FOX had?

Fox News Poll: Most Blame Bush for Economy The Washington Independent

I went directly to FOX and could not find that poll but I did find this poll

Fox News Poll: 76 Percent Say Time for Obama to Take Responsibility

FOXNews.com - Fox News Poll: 76 Percent Say Time for Obama to Take Responsibility

You have just been PAWNED
 
Last edited:
you are aware that wingnut o/p's like this one really don't invite nuanced discussion, right?

No one forced to to post a message did they? Yet you did., Beeeah Bye:cuckoo:

lol.. i know, you'd rather troll uninterrupted. :)

when you start a freak thread like this, there's no discussion. it just buys you your echo chamber.

no one told you you have to post on a messageboard that has people who aren't part of your echo chamber. yet you do. beeeah bye :cuckoo: yourself :cuckoo:
 

Forum List

Back
Top