S
smirkinjesus
Guest
DKSuddeth said:AQ doesnt care who you vote for. AQ wants you to be afraid, that is all. oh, and dead as well.
I agree with you 100%
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
DKSuddeth said:AQ doesnt care who you vote for. AQ wants you to be afraid, that is all. oh, and dead as well.
Kathianne said:It looks like that and more. Interesting article in the Atlantic this month, on the goal being the expansion of Islam. Is it working?
Said1 said:I'm sure they've managed to find a convert or two, but I would place my bets on extremists, and the growing numbers of Muslims joining them.
Kathianne said:As I posted earlier, the Justice Department news conference on their sting operation arrests today, had an interesting point. It seems the imam at that mosque was speaking to the guy who eventually became the 'undercover' agent. He was speaking of 'jihad'. That there was 'internal jihad' which was for all and 'external, violent jihad' also. His original point was that it was not 'now' the time for the external jihad. Yet when asked to launder money for supplying weapon to bring down jet, that supposedly would carry the Pakastani ambassador, he agreed and did so.
smirkinjesus said:I have to laugh when I hear crap like this. Look, Al Qaida does not share your obsession with Bush or his bid for reelection. They hate America. They hate America if Clinton is running it, they hate America if Bush is running it and they'll hate America just as much if Kerry is running it. They don't care. And if they even bother to think about the internal politics of the United States, you can bet they are absolutely thrilled that we have engaged them in the Middle East. They spent a decade trying to get our attention, they want War with America more then anything else. Whether it was a good decision or a bad decision, Bush has given them exactly what they want, a declaration of War. That is a fact.
eseid said:waiting....waiting....waiting....think I felt a nibble...must be patient...
smirkinjesus said:Bush gave legitimacy to a group of sick criminals by declaring war on "them" as if they were a state. 9-11 followed by the invasion of Iraq (which didn't make any sense) gave them all the recruitment material they need.
JIHADTHIS said:They've been "recruiting" and waging war on us long, long before 9/11. Bush wasn't even a consideration for President in 93 when the first attempt to knock down the WTC was attempted. Your actually injecting your "anti Bush" rhetoric into the conversation.
smirkinjesus said:Oh no, I understand that very well. But the 9-11 attacks gave them recognition; the invasion of Iraq gave them legitimacy; the subsequent occupation gave them sympathy and the successful insurgency gave them credibility, in the eyes of Muslims that is. Who wins the election means little, besides, Kerry doesnt seem to want to do anything different then Bush so the war will go on and on either way.
smirkinjesus said:Oh no, I understand that very well. But the 9-11 attacks gave them recognition; the invasion of Iraq gave them legitimacy; the subsequent occupation gave them sympathy and the successful insurgency gave them credibility, in the eyes of Muslims that is. Who wins the election means little, besides, Kerry doesnt seem to want to do anything different then Bush so the war will go on and on either way.
freeandfun1 said:I don't know about you, but just because we didn't recognize them doesn't mean they didn't exist. I think 911 kinda proves that and it could be said, 911 is what FINALLY gave them the legitimacy we needed to really go after them.
smirkinjesus said:Oh no, I understand that very well. But the 9-11 attacks gave them recognition; the invasion of Iraq gave them legitimacy; the subsequent occupation gave them sympathy and the successful insurgency gave them credibility, in the eyes of Muslims that is. Who wins the election means little, besides, Kerry doesnt seem to want to do anything different then Bush so the war will go on and on either way.
JIHADTHIS said:If JK were to win, I think Iraq would wind down, and that would be the end of it. I really don't see him staying on the offensive.
JIHADTHIS said:I'm not sure if AQ cares who wins, we really don't have a way of knowing.
I think that when GB wins re-election, he will put the screws to NK, Iran & Syria (maybe not in that order) and rightly so.
If JK were to win, I think Iraq would wind down, and that would be the end of it. I really don't see him staying on the offensive.
smirkinjesus said:Fair enough, I just don't think they care. But Dubya is going to have a tough time dealing with those three while we're bogged down in Iraq. We'll see.
freeandfun1 said:Contrary to popular "liberal" belief, we are not "bogged down" in Iraq.
smirkinjesus said:They don't watch Foxnews 24-hours a day
smirkinjesus said:Of course we're not "bogged down"! Everything is going smashingly well in Iraq! The Exit is just around the corner.