Why would Trump mock a reporter's disability and then deny he did so?

[Roudy]

It's as if it doesn't occur to his caveman brain at the time there would be a wave of criticism to follow. Is he really that dumb? There is no logic to his bombastic rambling.

Trump called out for appearing to mock disability

Because his fascist pig supporters can then simultaneously claim he didn't mock anyone while at the same time laughing and high fiving each other for him mocking someone. Half of the posts I have read defending the fascist Trump's actions have slurs against the handicapped - so that tells you all you need to know.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

 

[Pogo]

Trump, the man who is going to deport 12 million illegal aliens in 2 years, build a 2,000 mile fence and make Mexico pay for it, and who is going to singlehandedly repeal the constitutional amendment that is the basis of anchor babies, is your idea of a beacon of "Honesty"?

I wouldn't characterize him as a symbol of honesty. But he's far more honest and candid than the bullshit artist we have in office, or Hillary the criminal server wiper who we now know both lied to the American people over Ben Ghazi. But you guys see nothing wrong with those two, now do you?

Excellent. Having been called out for deflection, he counters with.... deflection. This guy just keeps ya guessing.

The deflection started with making fun of trump as a "beacon of honesty". Keep up.

Except that's not deflection at all. It's actually what we call the "topic".

Yes, so it isn't a deflection to point out that if Trump is being accused of being dishonest (politically incorrect, actually), while you guys are willing to totally glossy over all the lies and betrayals by Obama and Hillary. It's just giving you some perspective of the hypocrisy of the left.

You just doubled down on your own deflection, and you're too dense to discern it.

How's that for alliterative dysfunction....

Neither "Obama" nor "Hillary" nor anyone else has jack squat to do with this. The man committed a rhetorical faux pas, or however you choose to characterize it. He did that by himself; no one forced him. But that's not the point.

The point here is that AFTER having done that he DENIED HAVING DONE IT. Even though it's clearly on video.

How else does this exist?

​

-- what the hell is that, some kind of photoshop? Is that some comedian impersonating Rump?

Once again, neither "Obama", nor "Hillary", nor anybody else in the word, forced him to deny what's sitting right there in a video image. It EXISTS. And you cannot just declare it doesn't and make it go away.

So your desperation to bring in all sorts of people -- who have never done the same thing anyway -- is nakedly transparent and a testament to the blind sycophancy pants you wear.

"Sycophancy pants" -- I kill me..

And by the way --- nice knee pads, jellyfish.

 

[Vigilante]

OCDGirl, is OCDing again! Pogo at her height of mental disorder. Come on OCDGirl, get us a video of Serge FLINGING HIS ARM AROUND AS TRUMP DID HILARIOUSLY!

 

[Roudy]

I wouldn't characterize him as a symbol of honesty. But he's far more honest and candid than the bullshit artist we have in office, or Hillary the criminal server wiper who we now know both lied to the American people over Ben Ghazi. But you guys see nothing wrong with those two, now do you?

Excellent. Having been called out for deflection, he counters with.... deflection. This guy just keeps ya guessing.

The deflection started with making fun of trump as a "beacon of honesty". Keep up.

Except that's not deflection at all. It's actually what we call the "topic".

Yes, so it isn't a deflection to point out that if Trump is being accused of being dishonest (politically incorrect, actually), while you guys are willing to totally glossy over all the lies and betrayals by Obama and Hillary. It's just giving you some perspective of the hypocrisy of the left.

You just doubled down on your own deflection, and you're too dense to discern it.

How's that for alliterative dysfunction....

Neither "Obama" nor "Hillary" nor anyone else has jack squat to do with this. The man committed a rhetorical faux pas, or however you choose to characterize it. He did that by himself; no one forced him. But that's not the point.

The point here is that AFTER having done that he DENIED HAVING DONE IT. Even though it's clearly on video.

How else does this exist?

​

-- what the hell is that, some kind of photoshop? Is that some comedian impersonating Rump?

Once again, neither "Obama", nor "Hillary", nor anybody else in the word, forced him to deny what's sitting right there in a video image. It EXISTS. And you cannot just declare it doesn't and make it go away.

So your desperation to bring in all sorts of people -- who have never done the same thing anyway -- is nakedly transparent and a testament to the blind sycophancy pants you wear.

"Sycophancy pants" -- I kill me..

And by the way --- nice knee pads, jellyfish.

I don't see any mocking of a handicap, just a general mocking expression of someone who's trying to bullshit their way out of someone they said 15 years ago.

 

[auditor0007]

Wait

It makes more sense if Trump stands his ground. He campaigns on being politically incorrect, so why try to do the PC thing of apologizing?

Whether he apologizes or not is less of an issue than flatly denying the reality of what's recorded on video. That's psychotic denialism.

The man's just not playing with a full deck. Completely untethered to the world of reality.

In other words, a politically incorrect move!

Trump gains another 5 points for this

Trump may well win the nomination with 30% of the Republican vote, and that may only equate to 35% of the total vote in the general election. I have to at least keep the hope that more than 60% of Americans would not be capable of voting for that piece of trash.

 

[Vigilante]

Wait

It makes more sense if Trump stands his ground. He campaigns on being politically incorrect, so why try to do the PC thing of apologizing?

Whether he apologizes or not is less of an issue than flatly denying the reality of what's recorded on video. That's psychotic denialism.

The man's just not playing with a full deck. Completely untethered to the world of reality.

In other words, a politically incorrect move!

Trump gains another 5 points for this

Trump may well win the nomination with 30% of the Republican vote, and that may only equate to 35% of the total vote in the general election. I have to at least keep the hope that more than 60% of Americans would not be capable of voting for that piece of trash.

Yes, the Hildebeast IS a piece of garbage!

 

[Pogo]

OCDGirl, is OCDing again! Pogo at her height of mental disorder. Come on OCDGirl, get us a video of Serge FLINGING HIS ARM AROUND AS TRUMP DID HILARIOUSLY!

Your lameass YouTube video makes no point. Don't you even GET that?

The only one of the two acting out or looking retarded there is Rump. You made the point opposite from the one you think you made, and you're too dense or senile to even see it.

SMFH....

 

[auditor0007]

Wait

It makes more sense if Trump stands his ground. He campaigns on being politically incorrect, so why try to do the PC thing of apologizing?

Whether he apologizes or not is less of an issue than flatly denying the reality of what's recorded on video. That's psychotic denialism.

The man's just not playing with a full deck. Completely untethered to the world of reality.

In other words, a politically incorrect move!

Trump gains another 5 points for this

Trump may well win the nomination with 30% of the Republican vote, and that may only equate to 35% of the total vote in the general election. I have to at least keep the hope that more than 60% of Americans would not be capable of voting for that piece of trash.

Yes, the Hildebeast IS a piece of garbage!

View attachment 55781

Nice comeback. You're awesome!

 

[bripat9643]

He was mocking the guy, not a disability.

And if the guy didn't have that disability what would mocking him look like?

Trump says he was mocking him not his disability. But the left insists he is as a diversion, because Trump came up with proof of his claim about Muslims.

Mocking: making fun of someone or something in a cruel way; derisive.

When you imitate with gestures a person's disability to get a laugh out of the audience, that is a perfect example of mocking a disability.

No, that's mocking the guy who has the disability.

Apparently you can't mock anyone who pretends to be a journalist, lies, and hides the truth, because he has a disability.

Liberals are always trying to find someone whe engenders sympathy so that person can do their dirty work for them and leave their hands unsoiled.

 

[bripat9643]

Wait

It makes more sense if Trump stands his ground. He campaigns on being politically incorrect, so why try to do the PC thing of apologizing?

Whether he apologizes or not is less of an issue than flatly denying the reality of what's recorded on video. That's psychotic denialism.

The man's just not playing with a full deck. Completely untethered to the world of reality.

In other words, a politically incorrect move!

Trump gains another 5 points for this

Trump may well win the nomination with 30% of the Republican vote, and that may only equate to 35% of the total vote in the general election. I have to at least keep the hope that more than 60% of Americans would not be capable of voting for that piece of trash.

You really have to despise anyone who can hold their nose and vote for a piece of shit like Hillary.

 

[Camp]

Wait

It makes more sense if Trump stands his ground. He campaigns on being politically incorrect, so why try to do the PC thing of apologizing?

Whether he apologizes or not is less of an issue than flatly denying the reality of what's recorded on video. That's psychotic denialism.

The man's just not playing with a full deck. Completely untethered to the world of reality.

In other words, a politically incorrect move!

Trump gains another 5 points for this

Trump may well win the nomination with 30% of the Republican vote, and that may only equate to 35% of the total vote in the general election. I have to at least keep the hope that more than 60% of Americans would not be capable of voting for that piece of trash.

You really have to despise anyone who can hold their nose and vote for a piece of shit like Hillary.

Disgust for Trump's mimicking a disabled person and childlike immature impersonation crosses all party lines. Despicable behavior is what it is. Those not willing to accept Trump's latest foray into ignorance and proof of his warped thinking process are restricted to brainwashed suckers.

 

[bripat9643]

Wait

It makes more sense if Trump stands his ground. He campaigns on being politically incorrect, so why try to do the PC thing of apologizing?

Whether he apologizes or not is less of an issue than flatly denying the reality of what's recorded on video. That's psychotic denialism.

The man's just not playing with a full deck. Completely untethered to the world of reality.

In other words, a politically incorrect move!

Trump gains another 5 points for this

Trump may well win the nomination with 30% of the Republican vote, and that may only equate to 35% of the total vote in the general election. I have to at least keep the hope that more than 60% of Americans would not be capable of voting for that piece of trash.

You really have to despise anyone who can hold their nose and vote for a piece of shit like Hillary.

Disgust for Trump's mimicking a disabled person and childlike immature impersonation crosses all party lines. Despicable behavior is what it is. Those not willing to accept Trump's latest foray into ignorance and proof of his warped thinking process are restricted to brainwashed suckers.

If it "crosses all lines," then why are the libs the only ones attacking him? Most people understand that it's OK to attack lying assholes like that reporter who was trying to take back his report of 14 years earlier for the purpose of supporting smears against Trump.

 

[Flopper]

Trump says he was mocking him not his disability. But the left insists he is as a diversion, because Trump came up with proof of his claim about Muslims.

Mocking: making fun of someone or something in a cruel way; derisive.

When you imitate with gestures a person's disability to get a laugh out of the audience, that is a perfect example of mocking a disability.

No, that's mocking the guy who has the disability.

That is the definition of mocking, making fun of someone or something in a cruel way; derisive. How can anyone watch the video and conclude otherwise?

Actually, it is exactly how bullies mocked people who had epileptic seizures in high school. Trump, of course, never really grew up.

I don't recall anyone mocking someone for having an epileptic seizure. I saw someone having one on the way into high school one day, and it's not something anyone would mock. Trump was mocking an asshole reporter who was trying to smear him by denying what he had reported 14 years earlier. He got what he deserved.

He did a lot more than just deny what the reporter had reported 14 years earlier but that's Trump, just like when he attacked Megan Killer with his comment of "blood coming out of her whatever". These comments go way pass political correctness. It's if Trump wants to prove that no matter how low the blow, he can land one lower.

 

[Flopper]

Whether he apologizes or not is less of an issue than flatly denying the reality of what's recorded on video. That's psychotic denialism.

The man's just not playing with a full deck. Completely untethered to the world of reality.

In other words, a politically incorrect move!

Trump gains another 5 points for this

Trump may well win the nomination with 30% of the Republican vote, and that may only equate to 35% of the total vote in the general election. I have to at least keep the hope that more than 60% of Americans would not be capable of voting for that piece of trash.

You really have to despise anyone who can hold their nose and vote for a piece of shit like Hillary.

Disgust for Trump's mimicking a disabled person and childlike immature impersonation crosses all party lines. Despicable behavior is what it is. Those not willing to accept Trump's latest foray into ignorance and proof of his warped thinking process are restricted to brainwashed suckers.

If it "crosses all lines," then why are the libs the only ones attacking him? Most people understand that it's OK to attack lying assholes like that reporter who was trying to take back his report of 14 years earlier for the purpose of supporting smears against Trump.

Oh, it's not just libs, in addition to all his opponents in the race, there's McCain, Lindsey Graham, Paul Ryan, Bill O'Reily, and even Ann Coulter just for starters. Apparent Republican voters are making their voice heard in the latest Reuters poll that shows Trump dropping 12 points after his outrageous comments about American Muslims and his mocking of the disabled reporter. Even Republicans have limits.

 

[Camp]

Whether he apologizes or not is less of an issue than flatly denying the reality of what's recorded on video. That's psychotic denialism.

The man's just not playing with a full deck. Completely untethered to the world of reality.

In other words, a politically incorrect move!

Trump gains another 5 points for this

Trump may well win the nomination with 30% of the Republican vote, and that may only equate to 35% of the total vote in the general election. I have to at least keep the hope that more than 60% of Americans would not be capable of voting for that piece of trash.

You really have to despise anyone who can hold their nose and vote for a piece of shit like Hillary.

Disgust for Trump's mimicking a disabled person and childlike immature impersonation crosses all party lines. Despicable behavior is what it is. Those not willing to accept Trump's latest foray into ignorance and proof of his warped thinking process are restricted to brainwashed suckers.

If it "crosses all lines," then why are the libs the only ones attacking him? Most people understand that it's OK to attack lying assholes like that reporter who was trying to take back his report of 14 years earlier for the purpose of supporting smears against Trump.

All anyone has to do is read your post and look at your avatar to ascertain what kind of suckers are attracted to Trump. You are the model Trump fan.

 

[Muhammed]

The outpouring of feigned outrage in this thread is fucking pathetic.

 

[Synthaholic]

So after proving that there were celebrations

Who taught you to be such a goddamned liar?

Trump stated that he saw thousands and thousands celebrating in Jersey City.

That is a blatant lie.

A New York Times leftist whack job reported that shortly after 9-11, the FBI was listening in on some celebrating Muskims, and even arrested and questioned soMe of them. Now suddenly the leftist whack job reporter forgot why he even said that. So was the New York Times reporter that Trump was supposedly mocking a liar? Make up your minds. Where did he get the idea that the FBI was listening in on some celebrating Muslims? What were his sources? Oh wait, he has a bad case of selective liberal amnesia. Maybe he should learn from Hillary how to wipe clean the server of his brain.

Trump said he saw "thousands and thousands" celebrating in Jersey City.

Did Trump lie or not?

 

[Synthaholic]

if Trump is being accused of being dishonest (politically incorrect, actually)

Neither. He's accused of lying, which is what he did.

 

[Synthaholic]

I don't see any mocking of a handicap

 

[Synthaholic]

America Is Too Dumb for TV News

What this 9/11 celebrations story shows is that American news audiences have had their fantasies stroked for so long that they can't even remember stuff that happened not that long ago. It's like an organic version of 1984, with audiences constantly editing even their own memories to fit their current attitudes about things.

It was preposterous from the start to think that there could have been contemporaneous broadcasts of "thousands" of people in New Jersey celebrating the 9/11 attacks. Does nobody remember how people felt that day? If there had been such broadcasts, there would have been massacres – angry Americans would have stormed Jersey City.

In fact, police had to be deployed to places like Paterson anyway to protect immigrants from exactly that sort of mob violence. This is one of the reasons we know Muslims weren't dancing en masse in the streets, because police were parked on those streets in huge numbers to keep people out.

The Newark Star-Ledger did a report in the weeks after the attacks from Paterson showing the city in "virtual lockdown," with police camped in Muslim neighborhoods for the protection of the locals.

"In this neighborhood, in South Paterson, we don't feel threatened," Samir Asmar, a Palestinian who became a U.S. citizen, told the paper. "But once we go outside, I fear for my wife and son."

Beyond all of that: if footage of such a celebration existed, it would have skyrocketed around the country, and not popped off ineffectually on some local broadcast for just Donald Trump to see and remember. The whole thing is nuts.