A
Ali
Guest
Bush is trying to get re-elected, as per his job description.NightTrain said:Bush is trying to protect us, as per his job description.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bush is trying to get re-elected, as per his job description.NightTrain said:Bush is trying to protect us, as per his job description.
dumphauler said:The world's going to hell- we'll be in an unending -unwinnable war for year's if not decades to come, thank's george, the future look's like shit. :firing: :crutch:
because nobody will listen to you until you get violent. Peaceful demonstrators get teargassed and beaten with clubs by policemen. Do you think the Palestinians could ever be taken seriously by Israel and the US?----NEVER
padisha emperor said:Karl Marx and Night train, you're so.......weak.
rejected the faults of Iraq's war on the Clinton's shoulders.....so you think - if it is a fault - that this war was bad . Thank you ! I see a light in your brain ! small, but there is one ! you are able to think now.
now....1991 : end of the Gulf War. 1991 : Busg senior was still President. from 91 to 92, i'm sure he did a lot against Saddam regime, i mean to push it down. His son finished the job in 2003. Finished ? no.....it is not finished in Iraq, eraly unfortunaltly for US and british troops.
You mean that Clinton is the asshole in this story....no. it is Bush....trying to reject the fault upon somebody else is a proof of cowardice.
If you want to return in the past, before Clinton there is Bush senior, who did the war...so..........
You're wrong, dears....
and Ali is right : bush is trying to be re-elected . He would be able to do everythig to be re-elected. Like...use the tragedy of 9/11 to get moer voices, during the Convention of the reps, in NY. NY hates Bush, he know it.
padisha emperor said:...
I have less vocabulary of english than you....
i meant : illegal
And...war is always chaos and destruction...BUT...
XVIIIth C. : the English and French did war from 1745 to 1783. (in fact, again after the FR...)
always, the officers were polite, elegant;..the famous sentence "messieurs les anglais, tirez les premiers !"...
In France we call this wars "les Guerres en Dentelle" : the wars in lace.
because all was fair pretty, nice, officers repect themselves, people didn't shoot on ennemy officers....
At this time...the word HONOUR had really a sense.
So this kind of war could be fair - not really for the soldiers...but more than now all the same -
padisha emperor said:...
I have less vocabulary of english than you....
i meant : illegal
And...war is always chaos and destruction...BUT...
XVIIIth C. : the English and French did war from 1745 to 1783. (in fact, again after the FR...)
always, the officers were polite, elegant;..the famous sentence "messieurs les anglais, tirez les premiers !"...
In France we call this wars "les Guerres en Dentelle" : the wars in lace.
because all was fair pretty, nice, officers repect themselves, people didn't shoot on ennemy officers....
At this time...the word HONOUR had really a sense.
So this kind of war could be fair - not really for the soldiers...but more than now all the same -
jimmyeatworldPE keeps mentioning a "fair" war. I have news for him, there is nothing "fair" about war not should there be. If ANY country goes to war, they should go to war to WIN. If they do not plan on winning, they should not go. Period.
Yeah, I'm sure that would all mean a whole lot to people that are willing to fly planes into buildings so they can have 72 virgins.
Get out of the 18th Century. Times have changed a bit since then.
padisha emperor said:CSM
jimmyeatworld
I did my answer, jimmyeatworld......not thinking of the beauty of the XVIII.
CSM semmed to think fair war is unpossible.
Only to show : before, wars were fair, to show to him that a fair war is possible - was possible -
padisha emperor said:honour on the battlefield. honour between ennemise officers. and repect. Hate, but respect.
(the line strategy was not bad at this time : the best prepared and with the best moral was sure to win. Look to the AR : the continental army lost so many battles against red coats, for the fights in line against them - Gates did it often - suicide !)
padisha emperor said:I was spoken of the XVIII.
and you will see, I do on purpose to not take the FR in the war against England : when you fight to survive, you forgezt sometimse honour. Like you during AR.
France in Algeria : against a guerilla. hard to have conventional fight. the torture are a shame for France.
but the french army, like the english army, has always this sense of honour.
(when you said i was correct, it was for the line tactic ?)
William Joyce said:The War on Terrorism is not a "world" war. It is a war between Jewish and Muslim interests.
http://nowarforisrael.com/