Why US Is In Iraq

Annie

Diamond Member
Nov 22, 2003
50,848
4,827
1,790
Upon contemplation:

http://varifrank.typepad.com/varifrank/2004/09/iraq_its_not_fo.html

September 17, 2004Iraq: It's not for us.

There's a few things I want to get a few things cleared up here before I set off on my photoblogging adventure at the Reno Air Races.

First:

War is not limited to just Iraq. The world is at War.
When we talk about "The War", some of us are talking about the Iraq Theatre of Operations in the First Jihadi War. Some of us are talking about Americas Unilateral Aggression in Iraq as an "illegal war". I hope to persuade the latter of the reality of the former.

Let's be clear here. Battles in this war have been fought on every continent in every country in the world. In the last three years the Jihadi madmen have killed in:

Morocco
Saudi Arabia
Pakistan
Thailand
Yemen
Somalia
Sudan
Jerusalem
Afghanistan
Jordan
Iraq
Kazakistan
Uzbekistan
Beruit
Turkey
Phillippines
Madrid
Moscow
Beslan
India
Bali
Manhattan
Pennsylvania
Washington D.C.

There is a clearly a war going on, but it is a "world war". Iraq is just a small part of it. Iraq is just one of many "Theater of Operations". And in case you havent been paying attention to the headlines, unlike WWII, we in the US are living in a "theater of operations". America is an active battleground. There is no safe place for us to hide, no organization with which we can sign a peace treaty, no border to respect.

Second. I want us all to understand something that I think we are missing in the debate over Iraq.

We are not in Iraq for ourselves. We don't give a damn one way or the other how Iraq goes. But the Iraqis had better care, and the Islamic world had better care. Iraq is not just a country, Iraq is the Islamic worlds last chance. If Iraq falls, our response to terrorists will no longer involve our putting our men and women at risk for the hope of bringing property and human rights to the native populations. Our response so far has been to allow our men to die in defense of greater ideas, in the belief that the people of Islam, if given a choice, would choose Democracy over Tyranny. We've given them a choice. The choice is simple, Change, adapt, or you will die. Not necessarily by our hands, but most certainly by their own. The Islamic world is so far behind in every meaasureable metric that without the accident of geology that is middle eastern oil reserves, it is entirely likely that Islam would have already died out like the ancient world believers in Marduk.

We have a choice in how we fight the Jihadis. Our men are not losing their lives because the enemy is effective, our men are dying because we wish to be humane. We will not continue to do this if we feel that the Islamic world would prefer to live in Tyranny. We can destroy people in mass numbers if we choose to. For now, we simply choose not to. Our respect for other nations and cultures is not a suicide pact. We will defend ourselves and we have been known to kill in mass numbers in the past to defend our lives and liberties.

Islam has the choice in what its future will be, not us. We can leave if we choose to. I would caution those who think that is best to remember that our leaving will not only not bring peace, to us or the Iraqis. It will very likely lead indirectly to the deaths of millions of innocent Iraqis due to the terror that would certainly follow in the rush for power and directly in the war with us that would surely follow.

Why are we in Iraq? To preempt a far larger and more deadly war.

Why should we stay in Iraq? Because to do otherwise would be inhumane.

Who gains if we stay? Islam will survive as a pillar of culture in that part of the world.

Who loses if we stay? All of the Jihadi Tyranny systems that exist. The power structures of the middle east have existed largely out of a power vacuum. By prodiving a strong alternative to the Jihadi leaders, we can lower their importance.

Who gains if we leave? The powerful who prey on the weak, those who wish to enslave people and treat women as farm anmials.

Who loses if we leave? Billions of innocent people who want nothing more than to live their lives in freedom.

Iraq is an experiment in which we can only hope that it will work. No one really knows how it will turn out. We've run this experiment before, in Europe and in Japan. While we were successful with those two, it would be best to remember that the world laughed at us when we ran that experiment in Germany and Japan. Once people are enfranchised with Democracy, they have proven again and again to be a powerful force, one that will very possibly overthrow the Jihadi Tyranny that exists in the middle eastern islamic world.

Knowing what the alternatives are in the world that "might be", I think betting Iraqi Democracy is worth the risk.

Third: The war is not our idea. This is not a border dispute or a trade problem or some cultural greivance in which we have transgressed the values of other people. We are hated for no other reason than we exist. Our women wear nearly nothing and live a life of freedom and privledge unfound even for men in the best Islamic countries. We are the living embodiment of blasphemy to the Jihadi madmen, as were black men to the klan and jews to the Nazis. It's not just our territory or our prosperity that threatens them, our every existence threatens these ghouls. You don't negotiate with the Klan, and you dont sign treaties with Nazis. You dont try to understand their anger or accomodate their needs in the world. You hunt them down and kill them.

The war has been brought to us, by the Jihadis. We've been trying to avoid it at least since 1979. We've tried every other method there is to not fight it, but its here and in the final irony, the best way to get the war over is not to avoid it, but to fight it to its conclusion. They must capitulate.

Those that think we can live peacefully 'side by side' with the Jihadis in brotherly understanding and respect simply havent been reading their books. Weve only been given one choice in this war, "submit to islam or die".

I'm not ready to do either. All wars are fought until someone capitulates. If you're not ready to surrender to the Jihadis, then I suggest you shut the hell up about seeking peace. We didn't seek peace with Hitler, we wanted him dead, at the end of a rope, or under city sized rubble and millions of bodies of his own countrymen, we didn't care.

Four:

How do you fight an idea? We don't have a Jihadi Navy to attack, Jihadi Air Forces to shoot down, Jihadi Armies in uniform all marching in neat rows to capture or their territory to command. Our enemy lives in the back alleyways of thousands of towns and cities throught the world. It lives on the soiled resentment of the loser in life who believes that their lot is the fault of someone else. "the jews' they used to say, and now they say "the americans".

How do you fight an idea? First, you defend your own. We are an important and valuable culture that has a lot to offer the rest of the world. Our culture has roots that go back 4,000 years and have been under assault in every generation since the Athenians thought up the idea of asking their citizens to participate in decision making. Every generation in 4,000 years has had to add to the tradition of laying down their lives for the freedom of others. Every generation finds a way to expand the offerings of liberty to mankind. Freedom is not free and liberty is essential to life.

How do you fight an idea? Do you stay home and hide? Ask the "freedom riders" who lost their lives in pursuit of other peoples right to vote in the backwoods of Alabama, Missisippi and Georgia. Ask them if that was only something that was important only for African Americans. Then ask them if the same rights they fought to secure in the south should not be extended towards the lives of the people of Iraq or Afghanistan. Ask them if the cause that Martin Luther King believed in and died in pursuit of, ends at our shoreline.

How do you fight an idea? Ask the men of the Union buried in Gettysburg. And then, go thank God that they did.
 
Some of these points may be right, but it not the only reson....

Don't forget OIL.
Odn't tell me I'm a troll, i will explain myself :
Only pro-Bush believe that Iraq war was a fair war. or at least, only US.
The whole world think and is sure that US are in Iraq for OIL. Maybe for other reason, but oil is the or one of the main goal.

Your message is good, on a rethoric point, Kathianne.
But don't trust everything. Propaganda exists always now.

You are sure that this message tell the truth, only the truth, nothing else than the truth.
The german population believed, even in 1944/45,that the IIIrd Reich's situation was good, and that Die Wehrmacht was victorious. Everybofy know it was a lie, but Goebbels' propaganda was excellent.

So, it can be propaganda.
I trust Ali's message.
It can be propaganda, of course.

But when the things are too much nice, too much perfect, it is certainly propaganda : here, the US goals are praiseworthy, perfect....propaganda.
 
padisha emperor said:
Some of these points may be right, but it not the only reson....

Don't forget OIL.
Odn't tell me I'm a troll, i will explain myself :
Only pro-Bush believe that Iraq war was a fair war. or at least, only US.
The whole world think and is sure that US are in Iraq for OIL. Maybe for other reason, but oil is the or one of the main goal.

Your message is good, on a rethoric point, Kathianne.
But don't trust everything. Propaganda exists always now.

You are sure that this message tell the truth, only the truth, nothing else than the truth.
The german population believed, even in 1944/45,that the IIIrd Reich's situation was good, and that Die Wehrmacht was victorious. Everybofy know it was a lie, but Goebbels' propaganda was excellent.

So, it can be propaganda.
I trust Ali's message.
It can be propaganda, of course.

But when the things are too much nice, too much perfect, it is certainly propaganda : here, the US goals are praiseworthy, perfect....propaganda.

And Ali trusts you too! You get along very well. Really is too perfect!

Your opinion of our country has 0 weight.
 
Sir Evil said:
You know I am really tired of your neverending "it was for oil" bullshit! if you can't post a link with credible evidence to back that claim up why not have yourself a nice cup of shut the fuck up!

You trust Ali's message? who the hell is Ali to you? his bullshit is every bit as bad as yours!


You know SE, I think I like the way you said that! :thup:
 
Your opinion of our country has 0 weight.

your opinion of France has no more weight......

but the french opinion, mine, Ali's one, is alos the opinion of the French population, of the spanish population, of the Uk's population, of the german population, ........;

The whole world think that you did war for oil, and for the possession of more strategic bases.

Doyou care about the WORLD's opinion ? no ? sad, definitly sad.
 
padisha emperor said:
your opinion of France has no more weight......

but the french opinion, mine, Ali's one, is alos the opinion of the French population, of the spanish population, of the Uk's population, of the german population, ........;

The whole world think that you did war for oil, and for the possession of more strategic bases.

Doyou care about the WORLD's opinion ? no ? sad, definitly sad.

America has more concern for the lives of it's citizens than what foreign governments think.
 
Normal.
who will blame you to protect US citizen...


BUT.
If you continue to ignore the international wishes, you will be in a shitty hell.....

UAS should have to listen more carefuly the world opinion.

Because when a country doesn't listen to it, doesn't care about it, his reputation will be bad bad bad, and they will be more more more countries against him.

For the USA, it means : more terrorists.

If USA do a friendly politic, the terrorists would have less support from countries, because these countries would be USA 's allies.....
 
padisha emperor said:
Normal.
who will blame you to protect US citizen...


BUT.
If you continue to ignore the international wishes, you will be in a shitty hell.....

UAS should have to listen more carefuly the world opinion.

Because when a country doesn't listen to it, doesn't care about it, his reputation will be bad bad bad, and they will be more more more countries against him.

For the USA, it means : more terrorists.

If USA do a friendly politic, the terrorists would have less support from countries, because these countries would be USA 's allies.....

PE, you are the one who is not getting it. Chirac made it very clear that France will stop the US from getting 'world cooperation'. Now, we are going back, why? Perhaps, though you can see the 'people' of the US have strong doubts, that Chirac has been isolated by his playing his high hand in EU, NATO also. Telling too many to, "Shut up". Schroeder I do not think, is going to go with Chirac this time. We will see.
 
padisha emperor said:
Normal.
who will blame you to protect US citizen...


BUT.
If you continue to ignore the international wishes, you will be in a shitty hell.....

UAS should have to listen more carefuly the world opinion.

Because when a country doesn't listen to it, doesn't care about it, his reputation will be bad bad bad, and they will be more more more countries against him.

For the USA, it means : more terrorists.

If USA do a friendly politic, the terrorists would have less support from countries, because these countries would be USA 's allies.....

So you think protecting our citizens is ok but we are doing it wrong?
The US SHOULD listen to wold opinion?--WE HAVE--It just happens that we don't agree with it. Which terrorist would like to have a political discussion on how to end this war? Which country that sponsers terrorism wants to talk peace with America?----NONE
 
there is a difference between protect your citizen and attack Iraq, Iran....

If the US operations were against the TERRORISTS and not countries.... against the terrorists' leader.
What about OBL' s hunt ?
 
The world's going to hell- we'll be in an unending -unwinnable war for year's if not decades to come, thank's george, the future look's like shit. :firing: :tank: :death: :crutch:
 
dumphauler said:
The world's going to hell- we'll be in an unending -unwinnable war for year's if not decades to come, thank's george, the future look's like shit. :firing: :tank: :death: :crutch:

:rolleyes: Think you are thanking the wrong source. :terror:
 
dilloduck said:
Which terrorist would like to have a political discussion on how to end this war? Which country that sponsers terrorism wants to talk peace with America?----NONE
because nobody will listen to you until you get violent. Peaceful demonstrators get teargassed and beaten with clubs by policemen. Do you think the Palestinians could ever be taken seriously by Israel and the US?----NEVER
 
Ali said:
because nobody will listen to you until you get violent. Peaceful demonstrators get teargassed and beaten with clubs by policemen. Do you think the Palestinians could ever be taken seriously by Israel and the US?----NEVER

In Iran, yes this is true, and worse happens. So it is in many countries in the middle east. The result of this environment is the creation of terrorists. That's why you can't take palestinians seriously. Their government is fascist and corrupt. :D
 
dumphauler said:
The world's going to hell- we'll be in an unending -unwinnable war for year's if not decades to come, thank's george, the future look's like shit. :firing: :tank: :death: :crutch:

Well i think you should thank Osama really he started this war by attacking us.
 
Sir Evil said:
You know I am really tired of your neverending "it was for oil" bullshit! if you can't post a link with credible evidence to back that claim up why not have yourself a nice cup of shut the fuck up!

You trust Ali's message? who the hell is Ali to you? his bullshit is every bit as bad as yours!
:rock: :rock: :rock:

I love you man!
 
dumphauler said:
The world's going to hell- we'll be in an unending -unwinnable war for year's if not decades to come, thank's george, the future look's like shit. :firing: :tank: :death: :crutch:


I think you'd better take a long hard look at who really is responsible for this bullshit we're dealing with now. Yep, your boy Clinton is responsible entirely for not having a clue about National Defense.

Bush is trying to protect us, as per his job description. How about a little gratitude, or if you can't do that as SE put it, a nice big cup of shut the fuck up to go with your doobie?
 

Forum List

Back
Top