Why the 'Silent' Filibuster Is Unconstitutional

Discussion in 'Politics' started by JBeukema, Jan 5, 2011.

  1. JBeukema
    Offline

    JBeukema BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    25,613
    Thanks Received:
    1,703
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,705
    Why the 'Silent' Filibuster Is Unconstitutional - David RePass - Politics - The Atlantic
     
  2. Revere
    Offline

    Revere BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,427
    Thanks Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Watching you in my profile page
    Ratings:
    +415
    The supermajority is not unconstitutional.
     
  3. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,565
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,982
    Once again for the slow and stupid, The Constitution STATES that each house is free to set its own rules.
     
  4. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,014
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,221
    Funny, I don't see anything there that makes it unconstitutional.
     
  5. thereisnospoon
    Offline

    thereisnospoon Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2010
    Messages:
    28,827
    Thanks Received:
    2,855
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Location:
    mid south
    Ratings:
    +6,399
    Filibustering is NOT unconstitutional. If it were, the SCOTUS would have heard a case then ruled in favor of this theory. Since that has not happened it isn't.
    Senate dems stated they would attempt to end the "silent" filibuster.
    This is typical politics. When a rule does not work in your favor, change the rule.
    The dems are going to shoot themselves in the foot.
    When the dems find themselves in deep minority status after 2012, they will wish they'd have kept their mouths shut.
     
  6. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,014
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,221
    The funniest thing is the silent filibuster was put in place to make it easier for the majority, not the minority. Filibuster rules require the majority to keep everyone there in case the minority Senators ever take a break so they can vote on cloture.
     
  7. Darkwind
    Offline

    Darkwind Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Messages:
    14,150
    Thanks Received:
    2,593
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +4,265
    Everyone knows that a filibuster must come with much wailing and gnashing of teeth, otherwise, it is just plain boring.
     
  8. Agit8r
    Offline

    Agit8r Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    9,142
    Thanks Received:
    1,052
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,174
    does that logic apply to EVERYTHING that is done unconstitutionally?
     
  9. loosecannon
    Offline

    loosecannon Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,888
    Thanks Received:
    263
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +264
    duh
     
  10. loosecannon
    Offline

    loosecannon Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,888
    Thanks Received:
    263
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +264
    Your definition of "constitutional" reads: what I like is, what I don't like isn't.

    You couldn't give a rats ass about the actual document.
     

Share This Page