Why Rand Paul just can't say no to white supremacists

[Bass v 2.0]

You rightwing monkeys are so damn retarded, no wonder I keep making fools of you, you tried playing the guilt by association card on Obama by indirectly linking him to Farrakhan, but here we have a Republican candidate accepting and refusing to return donations from white supremacists and the best you monkeys can do is accuse people of being racists and race baiters for pointing it out, damn pathetic, as if that somehow suppose to make it ok, excuses or changes the fact that Rand Paul still accept money from white supremacists, you monkeys are pathetic. Thats the new rightwing damage control response to charges and allegations on racial matters, rather than confront the truth or admit wrongdoing accuse those that point it out as racists and race baiters.

You expect them to change? Its the RepubliCON$ way!

Oh is that right? Well besides attacking Obama with being a socialist, communist what argument are the rightwing TeaBaggers really have? How long will these monkeys keep pretending that the real reason they're attacking Obama is because of his race and not because of the budget? You monkeys got some nerve making signs depicting Obama as comparable to Hitler while one of your candidates is accepting donations from white supremacists, LMAO!

You meant not because of the budget, but because of his race.

These FOOLS won't change. Now look you got one FOOL insinuating that the Civil War had nothing to do with race and/or was unrelated to it and/or was a race issue today's Democrats would have had.

CLASSIC!!!

Precisely its his race they're obsessed with and its hypocritical of them to stay and denial about it while simultaneously ducking and sidestepping questions about their racial issues by accusing others of being racists and or racebaiting. No matter how many times they say budget I know they're attacking his race because they're offered no solutions to the country's problems other than the generic "we need to quit spending so much and make cuts" Republican BS.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Gee MA! Look! Another RACE BAITING THREAD from the bASS!

Gee MA! Look I'm ignoring a real story about real racist to call someone a racist. I've mastered the art of projection and name calling while wearing my fact blocker glasses

 

[JimH52]

When did the "facts" become race baiting? That sounds like a FOX news rational.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Why Rand Paul just can't say no to white supremacists

Now if he were really a nonracist Tea Bagger he would give back the contributions that white supremacists gave him, instead he wants people to really believe that there's nothing wrong for the simple fact that he has to keep his potential voters, a sizable portion who may be white supremacists.

Do you also insist that candidates return any funds they get from the NAACP or the Nation of Islam?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Why Rand Paul just can't say no to white supremacists

Now if he were really a nonracist Tea Bagger he would give back the contributions that white supremacists gave him, instead he wants people to really believe that there's nothing wrong for the simple fact that he has to keep his potential voters, a sizable portion who may be white supremacists.

Do you also insist that candidates return any funds they get from the NAACP or the Nation of Islam?

Please tell me how the fuck you equate White Supremacists with the NAACP. I mean, you have to take out the killing, raping, arsons, lynching and oppression to make them seem the same but I want to hear your take on it.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Why Rand Paul just can't say no to white supremacists

Now if he were really a nonracist Tea Bagger he would give back the contributions that white supremacists gave him, instead he wants people to really believe that there's nothing wrong for the simple fact that he has to keep his potential voters, a sizable portion who may be white supremacists.

Do you also insist that candidates return any funds they get from the NAACP or the Nation of Islam?

Please tell me how the fuck you equate White Supremacists with the NAACP. I mean, you have to take out the killing, raping, arsons, lynching and oppression to make them seem the same but I want to hear your take on it.

Did the white supremacists who donated to Paul kill, rape, commit arson, lynch, or oppress anyone? If not, I can easily compare the two because they both organized around skin color.

Just saying.

 

[Paulie]

This must be a Paul family legacy.

Last name Paul = racist.

Ron's got daughters too. I bet they're being fit for hoods and gowns as we speak

 

[ClosedCaption]

Do you also insist that candidates return any funds they get from the NAACP or the Nation of Islam?

Please tell me how the fuck you equate White Supremacists with the NAACP. I mean, you have to take out the killing, raping, arsons, lynching and oppression to make them seem the same but I want to hear your take on it.

Did the white supremacists who donated to Paul kill, rape, commit arson, lynch, or oppress anyone? If not, I can easily compare the two because they both organized around skin color.

Just saying.

White supremacists have raped, murdered and committed arson...So you would have to ignore their history to even compare the two...

Why not compare them to crayons since they are organized around color also?

 

[Paulie]

Please tell me how the fuck you equate White Supremacists with the NAACP. I mean, you have to take out the killing, raping, arsons, lynching and oppression to make them seem the same but I want to hear your take on it.

Did the white supremacists who donated to Paul kill, rape, commit arson, lynch, or oppress anyone? If not, I can easily compare the two because they both organized around skin color.

Just saying.

White supremacists have raped, murdered and committed arson...So you would have to ignore their history to even compare the two...

Why not compare them to crayons since they are organized around color also?

The NAACP's agenda is race-specific. In a time when human relations are supposed to be all about equality and breaking down race barriers, there is an organization with the AUDACITY to promote only the well-being of specifically NON-WHITES.

Please tell me how this is not only NOT a double standard in the face of crying about racism, but also how it is in any way conducive to breaking down race barriers between blacks and whites?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Did the white supremacists who donated to Paul kill, rape, commit arson, lynch, or oppress anyone? If not, I can easily compare the two because they both organized around skin color.

Just saying.

White supremacists have raped, murdered and committed arson...So you would have to ignore their history to even compare the two...

Why not compare them to crayons since they are organized around color also?

The NAACP's agenda is race-specific. In a time when human relations are supposed to be all about equality and breaking down race barriers, there is an organization with the AUDACITY to promote only the well-being of specifically NON-WHITES.

Please tell me how this is not only NOT a double standard in the face of crying about racism, but also how it is in any way conducive to breaking down race barriers between blacks and whites?

You're assuming (wrongly) that race barriers wouldnt be around if it werent for race specific groups. Is that what you're saying?

 

[midcan5]

Rand Paul is a libertarian, his political philosophy (if we can call it that) clouds everything he does and says. If you genuinely believe absolute freedom leads to nirvana, then condemning even evil becomes a problem as libertarians assume the marketplace of life eventually sorts it all out. Good stuff below.

Why is libertarianism wrong?
Critiques Of Libertarianism: So You Want To Discuss Libertarianism....
The American Conservative -- Marxism of the Right
Why I Am Not a Libertarian


"There isn't much point arguing about the word "libertarian." It would make about as much sense to argue with an unreconstructed Stalinist about the word "democracy" -- recall that they called what they'd constructed "peoples' democracies." The weird offshoot of ultra-right individualist anarchism that is called "libertarian" here happens to amount to advocacy of perhaps the worst kind of imaginable tyranny, namely unaccountable private tyranny. If they want to call that "libertarian," fine; after all, Stalin called his system "democratic." But why bother arguing about it?" Noam Chomsky

 

[ClosedCaption]

just what I thought...

Always crying about racism when you arent affected about it. Just looking for something to cry about.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Please tell me how the fuck you equate White Supremacists with the NAACP. I mean, you have to take out the killing, raping, arsons, lynching and oppression to make them seem the same but I want to hear your take on it.

Did the white supremacists who donated to Paul kill, rape, commit arson, lynch, or oppress anyone? If not, I can easily compare the two because they both organized around skin color.

Just saying.

White supremacists have raped, murdered and committed arson...So you would have to ignore their history to even compare the two...

Why not compare them to crayons since they are organized around color also?

So has the Nation of Islam, yet I am not going to say that the current leaders of that group are doing those things. The major difference between people capable of an intelligent debate and those who are not is that the intelligent people do not claim that what happened in the past is the fault of the people who did not do it.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Rand Paul is a libertarian, his political philosophy (if we can call it that) clouds everything he does and says. If you genuinely believe absolute freedom leads to nirvana, then condemning even evil becomes a problem as libertarians assume the marketplace of life eventually sorts it all out. Good stuff below.

Why is libertarianism wrong?
Critiques Of Libertarianism: So You Want To Discuss Libertarianism....
The American Conservative -- Marxism of the Right
Why I Am Not a Libertarian


"There isn't much point arguing about the word "libertarian." It would make about as much sense to argue with an unreconstructed Stalinist about the word "democracy" -- recall that they called what they'd constructed "peoples' democracies." The weird offshoot of ultra-right individualist anarchism that is called "libertarian" here happens to amount to advocacy of perhaps the worst kind of imaginable tyranny, namely unaccountable private tyranny. If they want to call that "libertarian," fine; after all, Stalin called his system "democratic." But why bother arguing about it?" Noam Chomsky

You link to a bunch of stupid stories by people who hate freedom in an attempt to prove that libertarians are all idiots, and racists?

Talk about stupid comments.

Why don't you do yourself the favor of finding out what libertarians believe from libertarians. Or is it OK for me to link to a bunch of communist attacks on Democrats to show what Democrats believe?

 

[KissMy]

Race-Card-Is-Maxed-Out

 

[ClosedCaption]

So has the Nation of Islam what?

 

[Paulie]

White supremacists have raped, murdered and committed arson...So you would have to ignore their history to even compare the two...

Why not compare them to crayons since they are organized around color also?

The NAACP's agenda is race-specific. In a time when human relations are supposed to be all about equality and breaking down race barriers, there is an organization with the AUDACITY to promote only the well-being of specifically NON-WHITES.

Please tell me how this is not only NOT a double standard in the face of crying about racism, but also how it is in any way conducive to breaking down race barriers between blacks and whites?

You're assuming (wrongly) that race barriers wouldnt be around if it werent for race specific groups. Is that what you're saying?

No, but it certainly isn't HELPING break down barriers,

Don't complain about white advocacy groups when there's black advocacy groups that you applaud.

The whole "but we're oppressed" line of reasoning is played out. It's time to stop putting any one particular race on a pedestal.

 

[ClosedCaption]

The NAACP's agenda is race-specific. In a time when human relations are supposed to be all about equality and breaking down race barriers, there is an organization with the AUDACITY to promote only the well-being of specifically NON-WHITES.

Please tell me how this is not only NOT a double standard in the face of crying about racism, but also how it is in any way conducive to breaking down race barriers between blacks and whites?

You're assuming (wrongly) that race barriers wouldnt be around if it werent for race specific groups. Is that what you're saying?

No, but it certainly isn't HELPING break down barriers,

Don't complain about white advocacy groups when there's black advocacy groups that you applaud.

The whole "but we're oppressed" line of reasoning is played out. It's time to stop putting any one particular race on a pedestal.

The NAACP doesnt put one group on a pedestal. On the other hand

White supremacy is the belief, and promotion of the belief, that white people are superior to people of other racial backgrounds. The term is sometimes used specifically to describe a political ideology that advocates the social and political dominance by whites.[1] White supremacy, as with racial supremacism in general, is rooted in ethnocentrism and a desire for hegemony,[2]

NOW THERES racisism for ya...please find anything like that from the NAACP. I'll wait...

 

[Paulie]

I'm not defending white supremacy. I'm pointing out the unavoidable and extremely ironic double standard that black advocacy groups can fight for agendas that don't include whites, while whites are condemned for such things.

Why does there need to be a NAACP any more than there needs to be a KKK?

There are already laws on the books protecting against racism. Pushing race-specific agendas through advocacy groups only fuels racial tensions.

 

[ClosedCaption]

I'm not defending white supremacy. I'm pointing out the unavoidable and extremely ironic double standard that black advocacy groups can fight for agendas that don't include whites, while whites are condemned for such things.

Why does there need to be a NAACP any more than there needs to be a KKK?

There are already laws on the books protecting against racism. Pushing race-specific agendas through advocacy groups only fuels racial tensions.

because those "white advocacy groups" think they are better than other races and should hold dominance over them. The NAACP doesnt. Thats the reason for the "double standard". Black advocacy groups have no desire to dominate any other race. In fact the last thing the NAACP did was this:

NAACP Files Predatory Lending Lawsuits Alleging African Americans Were Steered Into Unfair Loans
May 4, 2009

Posted In: Foreclosure , Loan Modifications , Predatory Lending
By Howard | Nassiri, PC on May 4, 2009 9:25 AM | Permalink

The NAACP has sued two major mortgage lenders, alleging that they steered a disproportionate number of African-American home buyers into subprime loans, the Los Angeles Times reported March 13. The civil rights organization accused Wells Fargo Bank and U.K. bank HSBC of "systematic, institutionalized racism" in their mortgage lending decisions. Both banks defended themselves vigorously against the charge. The lawsuits are likely to be joined with an existing NAACP suit against other subprime lenders, including Ameriquest, Option One Mortgage and Fremont Investment & Loan, all based in Orange County.

Now how in the hell is this action or any of the NAACP action comparable to White Supremacists? How did this hold you back or oppress you? If the NAACP was not there, blacks would still be oppressed and abused by these actions....Why do you take offense to that?

NAACP branches across the nation are addressing the predatory lending issue. In Michigan, the Detroit branch’s executive director Heaster Wheeler chairs the state’s Predatory Lending Task Force. He and others have met with Gov. Jennifer Granholm who has instructed the state insurance and banking commissioner as well the state’s civil rights office to coordinate with the branch to craft further legislation and use their authority more strictly to enforce current laws. The Washington, D.C. Branch has partnered with the American Association of Retired Persons. Through workshops, seminars, church meetings and other gatherings it has been discovered that the typical predatory lending victim in that city is an elderly African American female who is single and on social security. They are encouraged to refinance for home improvements and other reasons. The NAACP’s Connecticut State Conference has a committee to address predatory lending issues and has been actively engaged in assisting individuals in their cases. They are also encouraging legislative action and are conducting community education initiatives.

What in the fuck is wrong or divisive about that? I think the only thing divisive is that you dont like the NAACP and because you dont like them...it's divisive