Why Is Kerry Obsessed With Germany & France?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by NATO AIR, Sep 24, 2004.

  1. NATO AIR
    Offline

    NATO AIR Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,275
    Thanks Received:
    282
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    USS Abraham Lincoln
    Ratings:
    +282
    good point from the weekly standard

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/665sradt.asp

    Allies Uber Alles
    Why is John Kerry so obsessed with France and Germany?
    by Tom Donnelly
    09/23/2004 12:00:00 AM

    WHAT IS IT with John Kerry and "allies?"

    At some point, you have to take the French and the Germans at their word--especially when it involves not going to war--but only a little less so when it means not spending money. It takes a very willful sort of myopia to believe that, if it weren't for their irritation with President Bush, the "allies"--and this is code for France and Germany--would be standing shoulder to shoulder to us in Iraq.

    Nevertheless, in his big Iraq speech on Monday where he argued that Mesopotamia was a complete mess, the number one item in Kerry's Four Points (just ten shy of Woodrow Wilson) was offering the Euros another chance to get in on the deal. Or, more politely, "share the burden with us."

    Kerry reminded his audience that he has "repeatedly recommended this from the very beginning." And so he has; it's one of his few consistent positions. He also observed that "not a single country has answered the call" of U.N. Resolution 1546 for either troops or money or debt relief from Saddam Hussein's tenure. What's puzzling is not so much the fear or greed or spite of the Europeans--transforming the politics of the greater Middle East is not a task for those riddled by strategic self-doubt--it's that Kerry continues to ignore what the Euros plainly say. Almost two years ago the German foreign minister famously told Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld that he was "not convinced" about Iraq. There's no reason to think he's about
    to change that opinion.

    There are several possible answers to the question of Kerry and allies. One is that he knows the Euros aren't interested in sharing any burden and, even if they had the will, haven't the ways. Western Europeans, the British always excepted, have a hard time projecting and sustaining military force to the eastern end of their own continent, let alone the Middle East. The plucky Poles have contributed a larger force to the mission in Iraq, and kept it there longer, than the Germans could have.

    The second possibility is that Kerry really doesn't know any better. Though he's the son of a professional foreign service officer and is renowned for his appreciation of the "nuances" and "complexities" of international politics, he hasn't exactly been a frequent presence at Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings, as committee chairman Sen. Richard Lugar recently observed. Maybe Kerry lost track back in the 1980s, when the western Europeans were really on the front lines and the Bundeswehr was better prepared for combat. (He also seems to have forgotten that many real-life Western Europeans have answered the call.)

    Or perhaps we should consider a psychological explanation. Kerry is obsessed with European approval--it is "the only way to succeed!"--in ways that defy logic. Alliances are meant to be means, not ends in themselves. Kerry often seems more interested in strategic self-esteem than in actually winning the war in Iraq. He's more concerned with hearts and minds in Brussels than Baghdad.

    Any way you look at it, Kerry's biggest fear, as he has repeated repeatedly since before the beginning, is being alone in the dark world of international politics. This is, perhaps, a drawback if you're auditioning to be commander-in-chief of history's sole superpower and official Leader of the Free World.

    Tom Donnelly is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a contributing writer to The Daily Standard.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. CSM
    Offline

    CSM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    708
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northeast US
    Ratings:
    +708
    I am not surprised at Kerry's position on seeking international approval on everything. By doing so, if he should be elected, he can always blame the international community for failures in foriegn policy. I can hear it now:

    "Well, I wanted to intervene in the horrible genocide being committed in Lower Slobovia, but the UN Security Council threatened to hold a meeting condemning US action."
     
  3. NATO AIR
    Offline

    NATO AIR Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,275
    Thanks Received:
    282
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    USS Abraham Lincoln
    Ratings:
    +282
    that is exactly why though i don't think sen. kerry is a bad fellow, he is just a man of words

    bush is a man of action
     
  4. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    I think he is an ambitious arrogant SOB who not only wants to be president but "KING OF THE WORLD.
     
  5. CSM
    Offline

    CSM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    708
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northeast US
    Ratings:
    +708
    Bush? or Kerry? Besides, neither can be King of the World unless I, the Emporer of the Universe, say so!
     
  6. onedomino
    Offline

    onedomino SCE to AUX

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,677
    Thanks Received:
    474
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Ratings:
    +476
    Kerry does not have the nerve to address the real reasons France and Germany first tried to block, and then failed to support, American actions in Iraq: their desire to maintain lucrative business ties with the dictator (especially French oil contracts), and their desire to block the extension of US influence in the world. The business contracts are history. What remains is the EU need to prevent the further projection of American power. This will not change no matter who is in the White House.
     

Share This Page